Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Table 2 <br />Proposed Funding Scenario <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Year Project Component Amount ($) <br />1999 CWCB Construction Fund Loan 1,000,000 <br />1999 CDOT In-kind Construction Services 418,140 <br />1999 County and local government cost-sharing 505,063 <br /> agreements and other sources <br /> Total $1,923,203 <br /> <br />FINANCIAL ANALYSIS <br />The total cost of the entire project is approximately $2,4 million. The Board's investment in the <br />project would total $1.0 million if the loan request were approved, which is about 42% of the total <br />cost. <br /> <br />The source for repaying the loan will consist of an Enterprise Fund, to be established by the District <br />in 1999, that will place a service fee of $4,00 per month on all customers in the service area. Based <br />on the current number of taps, the new service fee would generate $105,984 annually, The <br />estimated annual loan payment is $63,209 assuming a 30-year term with an interest rate of 4,75 <br />percent. The annual revenues for the project are therefore well in excess of the estimated annual <br />payments, Other than the requested CWCB loan, no other liabilities would be incurred for this <br />project. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Based on the $1.0 million CWCB loan and the 2208 existing taps, the debt per tap is calculated to <br />be $453 per tap, This is a very reasonable number and is not considered to be prohibitive at all. <br /> <br />DISCUSSION <br />CWCB staff believes that the District's proposed conveyance improvement project is economically, <br />fmancially, and technically feasible, The investment is not unusually high compared to most other <br />similar projects, and the repayment of the loan will only result in a small service fee to the District's <br />customers. Existing facilities are not adequate for the conveyance of runoff or for the protection of <br />adjacent properties. Previous detailed analyses and studies have demonstrated the need for the <br />project. Alternatives to addressing the problem have been investigated over. the past 20 years, <br />however the proposed project has been recommended as the best alternative by the consulting <br />engineers, and has been recommended by the District and the affected local governments. <br /> <br />The District's ability to repay the CWCB loan is based on a minimal service fee (estimated to be <br />$4,00 per month per customer) and appears to be very reasonable, Creation of the new service fee <br />will not require a public vote. <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />. <br />