Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />..... ~ '-.F <br /> <br />) <br /> <br />It was moved by Judgec ,rohn,. B. O'Rourke and. seoonded <br />by Silmon Smith that aoting under. the prO'lisions of <br />Chapter 265 of the Session Lt.WlI of Colorado of' 1937, the <br />Board approve the appointment of GeorgeA. Pughe, to act <br />with Clifford H, Stone, formerly appointed. as a com- <br />missioner, representing the state. of Colorado to negotiate <br />a compact between the state of Colorado and the State of <br />Wyoming for the purpose,. and 1n accordance with the above <br />quoted letter of the Governor of the State of Colorado. <br /> <br />The motion was unanimously oarried and declared adopted. <br /> <br /> <br />Thereupon it was moved by ,Judge John B. O'Rourke and <br />seoonded by Mr. Dille that the Board lix the compenntion <br />of George A. Pughe as a Little Snake Compact CQIl1Iliuioner <br />and recanmend it for the approval of the Governor, at 850.00 <br />a day, together With neosssary travel and maintenlilos <br />expense, to be paid out of the funds of the Colorado Water <br />Conservation3os.rd. <br /> <br />Upon vote being taken the motion was carried and declared <br />adopted. <br /> <br />Jean S. Breitenstein, Attorney for the Board, was called upon to make <br />a report for the subcamnittee heretofore appointed by the Board to devise <br />ways and means for the State's compliance With the decree of the .Supreme Court <br />of the United States in the case of Nebraska vs. Wyoming and Colorado and <br />the UDited states, Intervener. Mr. Breitenstein's report is as follows. <br /> <br />"Arter the last meeting of the Board the cOlllDlittee had con- <br />siderable oorrespondence and has had oOt!! cClllllllittee meeting lIlone, and <br />one with representatives of Wyoming and Nebraska. At the first meeti~ <br />there came up, of OOUTse, the question of reservoir resurwys, It <br />was determined that the matter of making reservoir resurveys, if any, . <br />should not be _de at this time, but should be held in abeyanoe until <br />next spring. We thought that the matter of first importance would be <br />the determination of the irrigated acreage. Plans were made for de- <br />t.ermining the extent of the irrigated acreage by investigations and <br />studies to be made next summer. About Christmas time Mr. Hinderlider <br />reoeived a request from the State Engineer of Wyoming for a meeting <br />between him and the State Engineers. of Nebraska and Wyoming. The <br />meettng was held. in Denver, attended by Wardner .G. ,Scott, state <br />Engineer of Nebraska, Mr. Williams, head of the Irrigation Division, <br />L. C. Bishop, State Epgineer of Wyoming, and M. C. Hinderlider, State <br />Engineer of ColoradO, Charles L. Patterson and myself. <br /> <br />At that time the State of Wyomi;ag made several requests <br />in rala tion to the preparation and maintenanoe of reoords required <br />by the Supreme Court decree. Wyoming is in a difficult position <br />beoause of the faot that it made no investigation of the irrigated <br />aoreage. During the law suit they did not have basio reoords, te <br />start with, as Colorado has. Mr. Bishop requested that we agree that <br />the irrigated acreage in Wyaning is no more than 168,000 acres until <br />such time as they complete a survey. He asked us to approve the <br />method which he was going to use to determine irrigated aoreage <br />