My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01199
CWCB
>
Chatfield Mitigation
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD01199
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:59:02 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:51:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
1/20/1993
Description
Agenda or Table of Contents, Minutes, Memos. Partial.
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
92
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />g. <br />h. <br /> <br />Case No. 5-92CW031; Perkins <br />Case No. 5-92CW046; B & B Excavating <br /> <br />Dan Merriman, CWCB staff, reported that Agenda Items 18 a, b, and c were deleted, as <br />these are cases that staff is working on settlements for, and it is intended that they will <br />come before the Board at the March, 1993 meeting. Public comment from the City of <br />Loveland on Agenda Item 18c was given under Item 17b. Dan then summarized that <br />Agenda Items 18d through 18h represent statements of opposition that the Board has <br />entered into and proposed stipulations that the staff with the AGO and concurrence with <br />the Division Engineer, Division of Wildlife, that staff has worked out stipulations being <br />proposed to the Board for settlement of these various cases. Bob Jackson moved for <br />approval ofItem 18d for Arkansas Water Conservancy District stipulation as per the staff <br />recommendation. Dave Smith seconded the motion, The motion passed (6-0), with David <br />Harrison abstaining. Jim Lochhead, Ken Salazar and Dave Meyering were absent. Dan <br />Merriman gave a presentation on Agenda Item 18e. This stipulation was originally <br />presented to the Board in January, 1991, and was shared with the Town of Telluride and <br />San Miguel County representatives, who have expressed concern. The staff <br />recommendation is that the Board table any action on this Agenda Item to allow the <br />involved parties time to try and resolve the concerns and then come back to the Board at <br />a later date. Jay Skinner (CDOW) also gave a presentation. Steve Sims (AGO) agreed <br />with the staff recommendation. Bob Jackson moved that the Board ask staff to defer any <br />action on the stipulation on The Telluride Company until staff brings back further <br />recommendation, The motion was seconded by Sheftel. The motion passed (8-0). Ken <br />Salazar was absent, and Jim Lochhead was absented, but stated his abstention from this <br />Item previously. A motion was made by Bob Jackson to approve the staff stipulation on <br />Agenda Item 18f, The Dunkin Group, The motion was seconded by David Harrison, The <br />motion passed (6-0), Absent from the room were, Ken Salazar, Dave Smith, Janice <br />Sheftel and Dave Meyering. Bob Jackson moved for approval of the staff stipulation on <br />Agenda Item 18g, Perkins. David Harrison seconded the motion, and it passed <br />unanimously (6-0). Absent from the room were, Ken Salazar, Dave Smith, Janice Sheftel <br />and Dave Meyering, Bob Jackson moved for approval of the staff stipulation on Agenda <br />Item 18h, B & B Excavating. The motion was seconded by Janice Sheftel, and the <br />motion passed (9-0). Jim Lochhead abstained, <br /> <br />19. Instream Flow Program - Donation on Bowman Ditch" (4:27 - 5:06 p.m.) <br /> <br />Dan Merriman gave an overview of this proposed donation, General discussion was held <br />between Smith, Wright, Harrison, Lile, Smith, Lochhead, Sheftel and Martineau, <br />Additional comments were made by Roy Smith (USBLM), Lynn Obermyer (AGO) and <br />Jay Skinner (CDOW). Bob Jackson made a motion to accept the right on the 99 year <br />lease with renewable options and instruct the staff to determine the status of this right to <br />the upstream rights. Leo Eisel seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously <br />(I 0-0), <br /> <br />20a,b, Instream Flow Program - Staff Actions: Case No. 2-92CW067; Grand West <br /> <br />16 <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.