Laserfiche WebLink
<br />" <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Arkansas River Basin <br /> <br />Arkansas River Compact Administration (ARCA): On June 25 and 26 Hal Simpson and Rod <br />Kuharich met with David Pope as the ARCA Special Engineering Committee created at the Dec. <br />2005 Annual Meeting. Staff from both states presented the factual and policy basis for the <br />numerous contested accounting issues that Kansas has complained about under the 1980 <br />Operating Plan for John Martin Reservoir. We neared agreement on several issues and developed <br />pathways to lead to resolution on several others. There are still large differences in how the <br />States view some provisions of the 1980 Plan. In recognition of the potential for litigation on <br />some of these issues the States agreed to keep the substance of their discussions confidential. We <br />will be meeting again in Topeka on Aug. 28-30. <br /> <br />Kansas v Colorado Litigation Account Update: A description of activities and summary of <br />expenditures for this project is included in the non-reimbursable memo contained elsewhere in <br />this report. As of June 30, 2006 we had expended approximately $500,000 of the $750,000 <br />budget, with all work scheduled to be completed by June 30, 2007. <br /> <br />Las Animas County Groundwater Study: The USGS has released and posted on its website ( <br />http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2006/5109/)astudyentitled: "A Preliminary Evaluation of Vertical <br />Separation between Production Intervals of Coal bed-Methane Wells and Water-Supply Wells in <br />the Raton Basin, Huerfano and Las Animas Counties, Colorado, 1999-2004." (SIR 2006-5109). <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The report abstract states: The Raton Basin in southern Colorado and northern New Mexico is <br />undergoing increased development of its coalbed-methane resources. Annual production of <br />methane from coalbeds in the Raton Basin in Huerfano and Las Animas Counties, Colorado, <br />increased from about 28,000,000 thousand cubic feet from 478 wells to about 80,000,000 <br />thousand cubic feet from 1,543 wells, during 1999-2004. Annual ground-water withdrawals for <br />coalbed-methane production increased from about 1.45 billion gallons from 480 wells to about <br />3.64 billion gallons from 1,568 wells, during 1999-2004. Where the coalbeds are deeply buried <br />near the center of the Raton Basin, water pressure may be reduced as much as 250 to 300 pounds <br />per square inch to produce the methane from the coalbeds, which is equivalent to a 577. to 692- <br />foot lowering of water level. In 2001, the U.S. Geological Survey, in cooperation with the <br />Colorado Water Conservation Board, began an evaluation of the potential effects of coalbed- <br />methane production on the availability and sustainability of ground-water resources. <br /> <br />In 2003, there were an estimated 1,370 water-supply wells in the Raton Basin in Colorado, and <br />about 90 percent of these water-supply wells were less than 450 feet deep. The tops of the <br />production (perforated) interval of 90 percent of the coal bed-methane wells in the Raton Basin <br />(for which data were available) are deeper than about 675 feet. The potential for interference of <br />coalbed-methane wells with nearby water-supply wells likely is limited because in most areas <br />their respective production intervals are separated by more than a hundred to a few thousand feet <br />of rock. The estimated vertical separation between production intervals of coalbed-methane and <br />water-supply wells is less than 100 feet in an area about I to 6 miles west and southwest of <br />Trinidad Lake and a few other isolated areas. It is assumed that in areas with less than 100 feet of <br />vertical separation, production by coalbed-methane wells has a greater potential for interfering <br />with nearby water-supply wells. More detailed geologic and hydrologic information is needed in <br />these areas to quantifY the potential effects of coalbed-methane production on water levels and <br />the availability and sustainability of ground-water resources. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The Board funded approximately 70% of the cost of the study. In FY2007 the Colorado Geologic <br />Survey, in cooperation with DWR, will be conducting a separate study to assess the tributariness <br /> <br />19 <br />