My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01164
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD01164
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:58:40 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:50:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
3/21/2006
Description
CWCB Director's Report
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
96
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Pond System water rights. Applicant shall not divert from the Bell Pump and Pipeline at times when <br />such diversion would reduce the flow of the Roaring Fork River below the amooots decreed to the <br />above-referenced instream flow water rights. Also, at times when said instream flow water rights are . <br />not satisfied, Applicant shall release water from the Bell Augmentation Pond to offset out-of-priority <br />depletions from evaporation from the Bell Pond System. Provided, however, that this paragraph <br />shall not be construed as imposing upon Applicant any additional monitoring or measlD'elllent <br />obligations or require Applicant to install any additional streamflow measurement devices beyond <br />that required pursuant to paragraph 16 of this decree. <br />. The decree contains standard measuring device and reporting language (paragraph 16) and provides <br />that the State Engineer shall curtail all out-of-priority diversions, the depletions from which are not <br />so replaced as to prevent injury to vested water rights. <br /> <br />December 2005 Water Court Resume Review Process: After reviewing all the water court resume <br />notices published in December 2005, Staff reviewed approximately 28 water court applications filed in <br />December 2005 that potentially could injure instream flow water rights. Based upon that review, Staff <br />filed statements of opposition to 17 applications, identified in the March 2006 consent agenda. <br />Additionally, Staff was able to achieve protection of the Board's ISF water rights without filing <br />statements of opposition in five cases. This approach conserves the time and resources of all interested <br />parties and the water court. Staff discussed its concerns with the applicants' attomeys, and obtained <br />letters from those attorneys on behalf of their clients agreeing to include in their decrees the following <br />types of protective language to prevent injury to the Board's ISF water rights: <br /> <br />. In an application for an exchange, will include a term and condition specifYing the priority date of <br />the exchange (jooior to the potentially affected instream flow water right) and stating that the <br />exchange only will be operated when in priority. <br />. In an application for an alternate point of diversion, will include a term and condition stating that <br />(1) diversions at the alternate points will be limited to that amooot of water legally and physically . <br />available at the original points of diversion; and (2) applicant will not operate the alternate point <br />of diversion in a manner that will cause injury to specified instream flow water rights. <br />. In an application to enlarge Black Lakes, applicant agreed to attach and incorporate a copy of the <br />Jooe 23, 2005 MOA between the applicant and the Colorado Dept. of Natural Resources <br />regarding Black Lakes to ensure that decree is consistent with the terms ofthe MOA. <br />. In an application for a plan for augmentation, will include a term and condition stating that at <br />times a specified instream flow water right is not being met, during the month of April when <br />historic consumptive use credits are not available to replace out-of-priority depletions, applicant <br />will curtail its out-of-priority diversions (winter depletions are de minimis). <br />. In an application for a plan for augmentation including exchange, will include tenns and <br />conditions (I) stating that if the on-site augmentation pond is not constructed, or ifa sufficient <br />amooot of augmentation water cannot be released from the pond to prevent injury to calling water <br />rights, applicant will curtail its out-of-priority diversions; (2) identifying the priority date of the <br />exchange, acknowledging that it is jooior to specified instream flow water rights, and agreeing to <br />not operate the exchange when the instream flow water rights are not being met; and (3) stating <br />that applicant will replace all out-of-priority diversions in time, place and amount, or curtail those <br />diversions. <br /> <br />For each case, the applicant will provide the CWCB staff with copies of all proposed decrees so that staff <br />can ensure that the agreed upon language is included. <br /> <br />ISF Intern Program: For many years, the Stream and Lake Protection Section has operated a successful <br />internship program to educate and recruit persons interested in instream flows and Colorado water issues, <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />34 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.