My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01143
CWCB
>
Chatfield Mitigation
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD01143
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:58:33 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:50:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
12/11/1953
Description
Minutes and Resolution
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />311 <br /> <br />ledge and sincere interest to give assurance, that <br />Colorado will. receive all the water, to which re <br />are entitled and that the great potential future <br />which we have will be realized. <br /> <br />/sl Dan Thornton, Governor". <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Mr. Bailey: "Yesterday the Conference Committee, by a split vote of <br />three to two, adopted the findings and recommendations. I thin.l{ you <br />all have copies of this." <br /> <br />(At this point Mr. Bailey read the findings and recommendations of the <br />Conference Committee as follovlS:) <br /> <br />ij <br /> <br />FINDINGS AND llliCOMMENDATIONS OF <br />COLORADO CONFERENCE COMMITTEE <br />December 10, 1953 <br /> <br />1. <br /> <br />Mr. Petry moved that the Colorado Conference Conunittee <br />. make findings and rec01lll!lendations to the Colorado Water <br />Conservation Board for the use of that Board at its <br />meeting December 11, 1953, as follows: <br /> <br />2. <br /> <br />We find the Hill Report correct in its finding that <br />regulatory storage to take care of Lee' Ferry require- <br />ments is necessary for full development of Colorado's <br />share of Colorado River water. <br /> <br />3. <br /> <br />We desire that a substantial portion of that storage <br />be established in Colorado. <br /> <br />4. <br /> <br />That Colorado should insist on provision for substantial <br />storage in Colorado as a condition of its approval of <br />the Colorado River Storage Project Bill. <br /> <br />5. As a further condition for its approval of the storage <br />bill that Colorado should insist on explicit language <br />to insure that dovmstream storage built preceding Colo- <br />rado development could not have any priority to interfere <br />with upstream domestic, agricultural or industrial develop- <br />ment. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />6. That Colorado should insist, as a further condition of <br />approval of the storage bill, that explicit and binding <br />language be included therein, which would clearly make <br />available the net revenue of first phase construction at <br />an early period after completion of first phase projects <br />for the benefit of particfpating projects. <br /> <br />7. That Colorado favor the inclusion of the DeBeque Reservoir <br />as a first phase project subject only to submission of a <br />feasibility report by the Bureau of Reclamation. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.