Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.', ). <br /> <br />3. Rio Grande Silvery Minnow v. Kevs. No. 99 CV 1320. US District Court. District of <br />New Mexico. <br /> <br />After the 10th Circuit mooted the appeal, the parties are now back before the District Court on <br />various motions to dismiss the case and motions to vacate the District Court's opinion. The <br />District Court has extended the briefing schedule on this issue until July 29, 2004. <br /> <br />4. Southern Ute and Ute Mountain Ute Tribes' Settlement. Case Nos. 7-W-1603-76F & <br />76J. 02-CW-85. & 02-CW-86. <br /> <br />These cases involve conforming the Tribes' water rights, settled through consent decrees in <br />1991, to the final configuration of the Animas-La Plata Project. The state has filed pleadings in <br />support of the applications. Citizens' Progressive Alliance is the only active objector. The water <br />judge has now ruled on all but one of the pending legal motions, striking or denying many of <br />CPA's legal contentions. The disclosure and discovery phase has begun. A status conference is <br />set for August 27, <br /> <br />5. Black Canvon of the Gunnison National Park Reserved Ril!hts Case. No. W-437. Water <br />Division 4. <br /> <br />The state water court case remains stayed. The Colorado Supreme Court heard oral <br />argument on May 24 concerning our petition for review of the water court's stay order. It has <br />not issued any opinion to date. In the environmental objectors' federal action, the federal district <br />court judge denied the United States' motion to dismiss, which we had joined. The United States <br />just filed for an extension until July 26 to produce the administrative record. <br /> <br />6. CWCB {SF Application on Gunnison River throul!h the Black Canvon (Case No. <br />03CW265). <br /> <br />Nothing new to report. <br /> <br />7. Trout Unlimited v. Department of Al!riculture/Okanol!an County v. National Marine <br />Fisheries Service. <br /> <br />About two years after oral argument, the federal district court for Colorado ruled against the <br />Forest Service, Colorado, Greeley and Water Supply & Storage Co. in this case. The case arose <br />from Trout Unlimited's challenge to the FS decision not to impose bypass flows on Long Draw <br />Reservoir, located at the headwaters of the Cache la Poudre River. On cross motions for <br />summary judgment, the judge ruled against TU on most of its challenges, but nevertheless found <br />that the FS decision to allow 1.2 miles of stream to be dewatered was arbitrary and capricious <br />and a violation of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act (FLPMA). We had joined with <br />the water users in arguing that the FS could not impose bypass flows under FLPMA, because of <br />the potential for disruption of hundreds of water diversion and storage structures located on <br />national forest lands. On June 24, the U.S. District Court for Colorado entered an order granting <br />Water Supply and S10rage Company's motion to amend the findings in its previous Apri130 <br />order. This latest order does not affect the judgment. Under the Federal Rules of Appellate <br />Procedure, a notice of appeal is due to be filed on or before August 23, 2004. This office is <br />working with Greeley and Water Supply and Storage Company on appeal strategy. The Board <br />may wish to discuss this matter in executive session. <br /> <br />2 <br />