My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01106
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD01106
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:58:09 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:50:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
2/3/1962
Description
Minutes
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Commission is here today to get your <br />expressions and views. This is a very <br />acute problem in the South Platte and <br />in eastern Colorado. It has not been <br />decided by our Supreme Court and it may <br />well be. There has been a group of I <br />lawyers, engineers and technicians work- <br />ing'on a new state water code which may <br />have a bearing on this matter. Mr. Moses <br />of our Board is spearheading that work. <br />I don't think anybody can give an answer <br />to it right now. It may come from the <br />Supreme Court in a few years in a way <br />that none of us like. In an attempt to <br />forestall, we are trying to, by the <br />government's aid, to determine the relation- <br />ship between stream flow and return flow <br />and until we get a great deal more basic <br />information in eastern Colorado, where I <br />am most familiar with -- there isn't any <br />clear-cut answer but the Ground Water <br />Commission is working on those problems <br />day and night with this Board and they <br />are attempting to determine the relation- <br />ship. <br /> <br />That is just a layman's viewpoint <br />of that because in just about every meeting <br />we hear of it, every hearing and every <br />conference. <br /> <br />MR. STAPLETON: <br /> <br />The Governor would like to ask Mr. <br />Douglas a question. <br /> <br />GOVERNOR MCNICHOLS: I was wondering, Mr. Douglas, is it <br />your impression that if this project was <br />started on a pilot basis, let's assume <br />that it was found out that it did lower <br />the tables and some irrigators were in- I <br />jured in this, does the Bureau of <br />Reclamation have to have control of this <br />pilot project because the government puts <br />up the money or could a local Board be set <br />up which would make the determination as <br />to the basis of the facts that were developed <br />from the perimeter wells that it was in- <br />juring somebody? I am not sure anyone in <br />this state would be too happy to have out- <br />siders sit in judgment of whether or not <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.