Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Town of Otis Floodplain Study: Mr. Robert Standley; a property owner in the Town of Otis (in <br />northeastern Colorado), has expressed concerns about an ongoing floodplain-mapping project in Otis. <br />He owns property in the 100-year floodplain and is concerned about the validity of the current study, _ <br />Larry Lang and Brian Hyde study, met with the Standleys on July 5. They provided the Standleys with .. <br />engineering information and explained the technical b~sis ofthe study, In addition, they listened to the <br />Standley's concerns about the validity of the study, chi!efly concerns about the flood hydrology, <br /> <br />The fundamental flooding problem in the southern pari of Otis is that there is a significant railroad <br />embankment that divides the town in two geographic ~reas. The culverts through the railroad <br />embankment are undersized for the 100-year flow, so they cause a major backwater problem in the <br />southern part of town. In the summer of 1993, the most recent of numerous floods in that area of Otis <br />created a lake that inundated many yards and streets and caused flood damage in several houses. After <br />Larry Lang and Brian Hyde met with the Standleys, they met with the mayor of Otis and the town clerk <br />to review documentation of historic floods in Otis, including a videotape of the 1993 flood. They also <br />conducted a field review of the watershed upstream o~ Otis and found that some of the Standleys' <br />concerns had merit. ' <br /> <br />Larry and Brian have already begun making adjustments to the flood hydrology in Otis, They will <br />resolve the Standley's complaints during July and August. <br /> <br />Rio Grande Basin Issues <br /> <br /> <br />RGDSS Status Report: There will be an RGDSS Advisory Meeting at 2:00 p.m. on August 2 in Monte <br />Vista at the Monte Vista Coop (1901 East US Highw~y 160), The issues to be discussed include: ground <br />water data collection; steady state ground water mode~ results; a water budget model; average monthly <br />ground water model results; monthly surface water model results; Colorado's Water Rights <br />Administration Tool (CWRAT); and the July 2001 database release containing data through year 2000, _ <br /> <br />If you want a free copy of the July 2001 database release and viewing software for Division 3 on CD, 0" <br />have questions regarding the meeting, please contact Andy Moore at the CWCB (303-866-3441; <br />andy.moore@state.co.us) or the project manager, Ray Bennett, at the DWR (303-866-3585 x 263; <br />ray.bennett@state.co.us), ' <br /> <br />New Mexico Water Agreement: On June 29 the Interior Department signed an agreement with New <br />Mexico and the Corps of Engineers to provide water pows for the endangered Rio Grande silvery <br />minnow, The agreement will provide water over the :next three years for the endangered fish. The water, <br />30,000-acre feet per water year, will consist of Rio Grande water that would have flowed downstream <br />for storage at Elephant Butte Reservoir and contribut~d to New Mexico's compact deliveries to Texas. <br />The water will be stored upstream at Corps of Engineers reservoirs and released in coordination with the <br />U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The Corps, Reclam~tion, and New Mexico executed a memorandum of <br />understanding to store the water that was approved b~ the Rio Grande Compact Commission in April. <br />New Mexico is paying $41 per acre-foot to alter the timing ofthe releases for conservation purposes. <br /> <br />Summltville Mine Plan: On June 8 a proposed plan! for the final remedial action at the Summitville <br />Mine Superfund Site was issued by the Department Of Public Health and the Environment (CDPHE) and <br />the EP A. The preferred alternative includes the construction of a water treatment plant and a reservoir to <br />collect and treat acid mine drainage, The treatment plant will be operated approximately six months per <br />year. The effectiveness of the remedy will be monit~red by sampling surface water and sediments <br />downstream of the mine. The estimated cost ofimpl~menting the preferred alternative is $75 million, <br />bringing total site-wide costs to approximately $2351 million. A 30-day public comment period on the <br />plan ended on July 11. . <br /> <br />Rio Grande Headwaters Restoration Project nears Completion: On May 31 the consultant team <br />presented its final Technical Memorandum to the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC). That memo <br /> <br />tit <br /> <br />12 <br />