BOARD01095

• Board Meeting Date: 12/5/1979
• Description: Agenda, Minutes, Resolution
• Board Meetings - Doc Type: Meeting

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
L
I
I

9

for irrigation; four percent for municipal and industrial

water supplies, but which would not vary as a function of

the evaluation of factors sighted in paragraph 2.

The conclusion that we reached was that the third

of these alternatives, the adoption of a single service

charge which would vary as a function of project purpose but

would not take into account any effort to evaluate different

factors as between different projects would be preferable,

and we, indeed, have recommended that the fixed service

charges be as follows:

Two percent on flood control and recreation

purposes,

Three percent on irrigated agricultural projects;

Four percent on all other projects.

And, John, to answer the question you asked, the

staff recommends -- it is not stated here -- but it quite

clearly follows

that for a single project that would have

multi-purposes, we would recommend, number one, that it be

reimbursed in its entirety with respect to all project

purposes and, secondly, to the extent that it had multi-

purposes, the proj ect',s capital costs would somehow be

allocated and those portions applying to flood control, for

example, we would recommend a two percent service charge.

CHARliNE K. SCOGGIN

CERTIFIED SHORTHAND REPORTER
1JlSS UtllVERSITY HEIGHTS AVENuE
BOULDER, COLORADO 80302