BOARD01072

• Board Meeting Date: 5/13/1996
• Description: Summary Minutes and Record of Decisions - May 13-14, 1996
• Board Meetings - Doc Type: Minutes

8. Instream Flow Program - Statements of Opposition
Tape 2,Start/Stop: 0001 - 0250
Action: Items a-e were taken together. A motion was made by Patricia Wells to accept the
staff recommendations to ratify the statements of opposition which have been
filed by the staff to protect instream flow water rights on the streams listed.
The motion was seconded by Janice Sheftel and approved unanimously (8-0).

9a. Instream Flow Program - Authorization to Proceed to Trial Case No. 1-94CW268;
Lakeview Village
Tape 2, Start/Stop: 0250 - 0314
Action: Information item; no action taken.

10. Instream Flow Program - Preliminary Review of Request for Modification - Snowmass
Creek
Tape 2, Start/Stop: 0314 - 3860
Action: David Harrison recused himself from voting on this issue, but said that he would
participate in the setting of meeting dates and establishing a procedure to be
followed. During the discussion on procedure setting, there were seven
motions made.

A motion was made by Ray Werner that the procedures will be set frrst, and
then the hearing date would be set for a day and a half sometime convenient
to the Board in late July or August. The motion was seconded by David
Smith and approved unanimously (8-0).

A motion was made by Ray Werner that the beginning of the meeting be set
for the afternoon of July 9th, preferably at 2:00 p.m., and that it would
continue through July 10th in the GlenwoodlSnowmass area. The motion
was seconded by Eric Kuhn and approved unanimously (8-0).

A motion was made by Patricia Wells that the order of presentation would be
staff presentation, supporters' presentation, and opponents' cross-examination
on the frrst day, and then opponents' presentation and cross examination by
supporters. Tills would be followed by a summing up/response by supporters
and opponents, public comments heard, and then a summary by the staff.
The motion was amended to reflect that the cross-examining would occur
within the supporters and opponents. The amended motion was seconded by
Eric Kuhn and approved unanimously (8-0).

A motion was made by Janice Sheftel that the role of the CWCB staff would
be defined that they could ask questions of people, and could clarify issues in
an effort to inform the Board, but without taking a position either as
supporters or opponents. The motion was seconded by Eric Kuhn and
approved unanimously (8-0).

Minutes May 13-14, 1996 CWCB Meeting