Laserfiche WebLink
<br />284 <br /> <br /> <br />,. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Discussion <br /> <br />Background <br />The CWCB has an active floodplain identification program for the state's 16,000 miles of <br />floodplains. The state, in cooperation with many partners, has studied over 8,000 miles <br />of stream reaches covering 90 percent of the developed floodplain areas in Colorado. The <br />factors which might necessitate new mapping studies or revised studies include: <br />1. "natural aging" of floodplain maps prepared many years ago, <br />2. changes to the floodplain resulting from large floods, <br />3. changes to the floodplain resulting from human activities in the floodplain, <br />4. changes in engineering and mapping techniques and/or data allowing <br />improved accuracy in studies, and <br />5. growth into floodplains previously unstudied. <br />Due to these factors there will always be a need for new floodplain maps, At present <br />Colorado is one of the most rapidly growing states in the country, so the need for new <br />maps is especially high, <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Historically a large number of floodplain maps in Colorado have been prepared by three <br />Federal agencies (FEMA, the Corps of Engineers, the NRCS). In the Denver <br />metropolitan area the Urban Drainage and Flood Control District has prepared many <br />mapping studies. Some local governments in other parts of Colorado (e.g. Fort <br />Collins/Larimer County, EI Paso County, Boulder County, Pitkin County) have prepared <br />their own studies. In the past the Board funded floodplain studies, but more recently the <br />Board's role has consisted primarily oftechuical assistance. <br /> <br />Recently Federal funding for floodplain mapping has been greatly reduced, None of the <br />three agencies listed above has a substantial budget for mapping. FEMA recently <br />completed its Map Modernization Plan to update the nation's inventory of Flood <br />Insurance Studies. To date, Congress has not chosen to fund the $750 - $800 million <br />plan, either through a general appropriation or through a proposed real estate transaction <br />fee. Until Congress chooses to provide substantial funding for the Map Modernization <br />Plan or some similar program, there are two likely scenarios regarding updating of <br />outdated mapping: <br />1) inaction or very limited action, or <br />2) a substantial increase in state and local funding of mapping, <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />In Colorado there has not been consistent state funding of floodplain mapping for many <br />years. Outside of the Denver Urban Drainage and Flood Control District and a very few <br />selected localities, funding has been unavailable or extremely limited at the local level. <br />In many cases, development in or near floodplains has gone on with little or no floodplain <br />engineering of adequate techuical quality, The result is that many maps in Colorado are <br />simply old and/or unreliable! There is no real source of funding to reasonably meet the <br />needs for new maps, techuical revisions, and updates. Local governments are usually <br />able and willing to provide cost-share funding for such, but they are not able to carry the <br />entire burden of the study cost. <br />