BOARD01033 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

....v.,.... I Secondly, there is the matter of account- ing in the Lower Basin. In reviewing figures we find that the state of Arizona is using approximately 7 million acre-feet of water from the Gila River basin. A good part of this is simply overdraft on pumping. The pumping in Arizona last year, in the state, was a little less than 5 million acre-feet. The surface diversions were somewhere in the neighborhood of two million acre-feet. We feel that there has been no proper mention in the Pacific Southwest Water Plan as to how the accounting for water is to be made in the Lower Basin. We do ~9t see them charged with reservoir evaporation, for instance, although we are being chargedwit~ reservoir evaporation auto- maticallY in the Upper Basin. There is certain water being delive~e4. in the Lower Basin to squ~tters along the colorado River which show in the report as 'unaccounted for river losses' to the extent of about 200,000 acre-feet annually. Again we say that someone has to account for that water, that it has to be charged to some Lower Basin state. I ,~ Those were the major points that we feel must be considered in any legislation to authorize the Pacific Southwest Water Plan. We ,ar.e, at a. loss as to exactly how to approach the. legislation in view of getting the neces- sary safeguar([~ :for t.he upFO>.: o..c; no" ....-01>\ennbor_ ing that Arizona helped us_~remendously in getting the Colorado River Project authorized as did many of the Congressmen and Senators from the State of California. We have re- ceivedhelp consistently from those states on mo~tof our projects, and we are in no position to'teil .. thezll, that we are against a project of theirs. aut.we feel that we, must have safe- guards as .far as the accounting of the Gila River 'andtheLower Basin tributaries are con- cerned. The Gover,no.rs were pretty well unified in that opiri1o!l:. The problem now. is to answer the Secretary and.explain to him our position.