My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01023
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD01023
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:57:15 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:48:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
7/8/1959
Description
Minutes
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
88
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />J.O":\:U <br /> <br />MR. SCHLEUSENER: <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />this point, they couldn't prove or dis- <br />prove that cloud seeding had any effect <br />whatsoever on this particular snow. <br /> <br />Now that was a few years ago. <br />has'been derived scientifically so <br />you can tell that cloud seeding as <br />has an effect on it?" <br /> <br />What <br />that <br />such <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />"I'm afraid so far as Colorado is <br />concerned in the high plains area, there <br />is no additional information to add to <br />what was told you a couple of years ago. <br />If I may go back a little bit, it amounts <br />to this; that the Weather Bureau, along with <br />the Army, the Navy and other armed services <br />have participated in quite a number of <br />experiments to try and answer this very <br />question as to what happens when clouds are <br />seeded. . <br /> <br />This was reported on in a special <br />report that came out in December, 1957, a <br />special report to the President's Advisory <br />Committee for Weather Control - a group <br />composed of scientists who had as aspeci- <br />fic job the evaluation of weather modifica- <br />tion activity. The report, in brief, was <br />this: that on the West Coast there is quite <br />conclusive evidence of a precipitation in- <br />crease on the order of ten to fifteen per- <br />cent and this'is big enough and good enough <br />that the chances are very, very small that <br />this is not a real effect. However, so far <br />as the High Plains area is concerned which <br />could be the Denver area and eastern Colo- <br />rado and also, I'm afraid, western Colorado <br />at this stage of the game, evidence is not <br />sufficient to prove an effect one way or <br />another. AD increase could be there but <br />it - well, let's put it this way - an in- <br />crease could be there but the increase is <br />not an increase of a large order of magni- <br />tude, because if any increase is present, <br />it is of a small order of magnitude and it <br />is difficult to detect. At the present <br />time there is no proof one way or the other <br />that precipitation is either increased or <br />decreased. SO,far as hail suppression <br />activity is concerned it is the same ques- <br />tion. The scientists will tell you we don't <br /> <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.