My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01023
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD01023
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:57:15 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:48:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
7/8/1959
Description
Minutes
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
88
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />J.vvG <br /> <br />detailed account of the seeding flight. <br />On the other two sheets there is a carbon <br />copy of their report of their operations <br />for the 6th of July, 1959. I think it is <br />well to say that we have the best coopera- <br />tion from the Weather Modification Company <br />because they too are highly interested in <br />knowing just exactly what effects their <br />operations are having on the northeastern <br />Colorado area. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />So much for the type of data that we <br />are collecting. The type of analyses to <br />be perfomed I think can be summarized as <br />two major points. First of all, we think <br />we can delimit the anomalies, that is, the <br />departures from nomal, that exist in north- <br />eastern Colorado this season and we hope we <br />can come up with some answers as to whether <br />or not we have one inch more or two inches <br />more or perhaps one inch less or two less of <br />precipitation over the area. That's item <br />No.1. <br /> <br />-' <br /> <br />The second item is, has there been a <br />change in the relation between rain fall <br />amounts and hail occurrence in the area as <br />a result of this seeding treatment? For <br />~nstance, this hypothetical question is <br />frequently posed: 'If it is possible to <br />suppress hail by a given fraction, say ten <br />percent, does it follow, naturally, that . <br />there will be a reduction in precipitation <br />amounts by ten percent or can we perhaps <br />eat our cake and have it too, suppress hail <br />and increase precipitation?'. This is the <br />question that we think we can answer or we <br />can get some answers on from this particu- <br />lar study. <br /> <br />As far as anticipated results are con- <br />cerned, I think it is easiest to simply show <br />you a series of charts here that would give <br />you the type of results that we think could <br />be obtained from this study. The first is <br />simply a delimitation of the anomalies in <br />precipitation that would be received over <br />the area. This is a very rough outline of <br />the northeastern corner of Colorado in the <br />area from Julesburg to Sterling on down to <br />Fort Morgan. This is a hypothetical case <br />of what we think we might find at the end <br />of the season; departures from nomal plus <br /> <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.