Laserfiche WebLink
<br />(pROPOSED) lO-YEAR STRATEGIC PLAN <br />ON COMPREHENSIVE REMOVAL OF TAMARISK <br />AND THE COORDINATED RESTORATION <br />OF COLORADO'S NATIVE RIPARIAN ECOSYSTEMS <br />COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Executive Summary <br /> <br />Riparian lands in Colorado have been severely impacted by many activities and actions, but none so much <br />as the invasive plant tamarisk (Tamarix spp., also known as saltcedar). Tamarisk is a tenacious <br />shrub/small tree that has a deep root system (up to 100 feet) and leaves a salt residue on the soil surface. <br />These characteristics enable it to quickly replace native cottonwoods, willows, grasses, and forbs. The <br />resulting tamarisk thickets crowd out rivers and streams; provide poor habitat for livestock, animals, and <br />birds; increase fire hazards; limit human use of the waterways, and generally use more water than native <br />vegetation. Infestations in Colorado are roughly estimated to occupy 55,000 acres and consume 170,000 <br />acre-feet of water per year more than the native replaced vegetation. <br /> <br />Governor Owens recognized this problem and issued an Executive Order directing the Department of <br />Natural Resources in cooperation with the Department of Agriculture to develop a 10-year plan for <br />tamarisk control within the state. This 10- Year Strategic Plan was developed through a working group <br />composed of representatives from these two departments and the Bureau of Land Management, Bureau of <br />Reclamation, Colorado State University (CSU), Denver Botanic Gardens, Mesa State College, The Nature <br />Conservancy, Tamarisk Coalition, University of Denver, and the U.S. Forest Service. <br /> <br />Congress also recognizes the importance of the tamarisk problem and has pending legislation that could <br />provide $25 to $50 million per year throughout the West for tamarisk control, revegetation, and research. <br />Colorado's congressional delegation is taking a leadership role in both the House and Senate on <br />formulating and moving this legislation forward. It is anticipated that a bill will be passed in early 2004 <br />with funding potentially available in 2005. <br /> <br />The 10-Year Plan is founded on 19 principals that provide a solid foundation for the Plan. Some of the . <br />more important principals are: <br /> <br />. the objective of tamarisk control is the reestablishment of native vegetation that can be <br />sustainable; <br />. the tamarisk problem in Colorado is significant but success is achievable; <br />. control activities should occur on a watershed scale, be partnerships between all affected <br />interests, and have local control; <br />. success requires control, revegetation, monitoring, maintenance, and appropriate funding; <br />. existing water rights, river management infrastructure, and property rights must be respected; <br />. education is essential to help establish with the public the importance of the tamarisk problem, <br />methods for solving the problem, and the need for appropriate levels of funding; <br />. research is important to reduce costs and improve effectiveness; and <br />. ifno action is taken, the problem will continue to grow and degrade the state's river systems. <br /> <br />Tamarisk is the primary non-native phreatophyte of concern in Colorado and thus has the dubious <br />distinction as the "poster child" of non-native plants impacting the riparian zone of the state's rivers and <br />streams. Other non-native invasive plants, notably Russian olive, co-habit with tamarisk and also deserve <br />attention. If only tamarisk is controlled, the potential for Russian olive to take over much of the riparian <br />areas is high. Therefore, within the context of the 10- Year Plan, whenever the term "tamarisk" is used it <br />also includes Russian olive as the other principal invasive plant that may be important to control within <br />riparian areas. <br /> <br />The I O-Year Plan represents a strategic approach to solving the tamarisk problem and describes specific <br />measures to take that will support the formulation and implementation of watershed level solutions <br />(tactical plans) for controlling tamarisk within the state. It is composed of the following ten components <br />that include both actions and responsibilities. It is important to note that progress on many of these <br />components is already underway. <br />