My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01008
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD01008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:57:00 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:48:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
1/27/2004
Description
CWCB Director's Report
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />.' <br /> <br />of mouse habitat could be impacted if the dam and reservoir where changed to accommodate <br />more storage space. The USFWS also wants to examine the area for other species such as the <br />Colorado Butterfly Plant and Ute Ladies' tresses Orchid. <br /> <br />Finally, based on our modeling of reservoir operations and downstream flooding impacts <br />downstream, there may be a need for a new floodplain study downstream of Chatfield Reservoir to <br />the Colorado-Nebraska state line. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />This mapping, if funded by the CWCB, will be developed along the South Platte River for <br />Weld, Morgan, Washington, Logan and Sedgwick Counties. The study would utilize a new <br />HEC-RAS model developed for the <br />Reallocation Study. Calibration ofthe model to <br />the laO-year flood event and utilizing this <br />model will map the la, 50 and 100-year flood <br />events. An initial estimate by the Corps for <br />completion of that floodplain study is $38,000 <br />for 212 miles of River. <br /> <br />Denver Water Reservoir Storage <br />Drought Response Report. 1/5/04 <br />Percent <br />Reservoir Storage (AF) Capacity <br />Antero 8 20.015 <br />Eleven Mile 70,60997.779 <br />Cheesman 60.121 79,064 <br />Marston 11.21519,796 <br />Chatfield 22,02727,428 <br />Dillon 223.571 254.036 <br />Williams Fork 60,11596,822 <br />Wolford Mountain 12.333 25.610 <br />Gross 31.17441.811 <br />Ralston 8.93110.749 <br />Total System 500,104673,110 <br /> <br />(AF) Full <br />0.0% <br />72.2% <br />76.0% <br />56.7% <br />80.3% <br />88.0% <br />62.1% <br />48.2% <br />74.6% <br />83.1% <br />74.3% <br /> <br />Chatfield Drought Declaration Update: At <br />the March 2004 CWCB meeting staff, Denver <br />Water and Colorado State Parks will make a <br />presentation regarding the existing drought <br />declaration at Chatfield Reservoir. Currently <br />the Denver Water total system is at 74.3 % and <br />Chatfield Reservoir is at 80.3%. It is believed <br />by many that the "severe and protracted (prolonged) drought" which justified the Board's <br />drought declaration is nearing an end. Instead, the parties should work to develop operating <br />criteria to be used during future droughts, <br /> <br />e) <br /> <br />Rio Grande Basin <br /> <br />Silvery Minnow Judicial Reversal and Legislative Action: Rio Grande Silvery Minnow, et <br />al vs, U.s. Bureau of Reclamation: On Jrme l2, 2003, the U.S. Court of Appeals, for the 10th <br />Circuit, released its decision in this case. The three-judge panel affirmed the prior decisions of <br />the District Court and upheld a preliminary injunction of the District Court. This case turned on <br />the issues related to Reclamation's discretion to release additional Rio Grande water supplies in <br />order to ensure the maintenance of flow in tbe channel to sustain the Silvery Minnow. Federal <br />and State agencies and amici argued that Reclamation's discretion in making endangered species <br />releases was limited by existing federal statute, project authorizations and water service contracts <br />and language in the interstate compacts. The U.S. District Court disagreed with these arguments <br />and the 10th Circuit affirmed relying on language in the 1978 U.S. Supreme Court Decision in <br />Tennessee Valley Authority vs, Hill which stated that every federal agency must insure' "that <br />any action authorized, funded, or carried out by such agency... is not likely to jeopardize the <br />continued existence of the endangered species or threatened species." <br /> <br />The 10th Circuit noted that: (1) under the principles of contract interpretation, the plain language <br />governs; (2) the contracts written under Reclamation laws envision applying subsequent <br />legislation in their interpretation; and (3) the plain language of the "shortage clauses" provides <br />the basis for Reclainations-discretion-to-allocateavailable-watenupplies-to-comply-with ESA. <br /> <br />U.S. Senator, Peter V. Domenici stated that he did not believe that was Congress' intent, and <br />certainly not his intent, with the passage of the ESA to circumvent the role of the State in <br />managing its water resources, nor to deprive lawfully obtained water service contract holders of <br />their water and water rights. He introduced federal legislation to address this issue, and looked <br />to his colleagues in other western states for support. According to a news release by Senator <br /> <br />21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.