Laserfiche WebLink
<br />The initial feasibility study for the project was completed in October of 1987 at which time the <br />cost of the project was estimated at about $16.7 million. The preliminary project design and .~ <br />$16.7 million cost estimate were presented to the Board in December of 1987. The Board <br />recommended a loan of $8.0 million from the Construction Fund as subsequently authorized by <br />the General Assembly in 1988 in SB-30. <br /> <br />Since 1988, a total of about $1.6 million has been disbursed from the $8.0 million authorization, <br />as shown in Table 2, leaving a remaining balance of about $6.4 million for design and <br />construction. <br /> <br />Table 2 - Summary of Disbursements from 1988 Loan Authorization <br /> <br />Ori inal Authorization <br />Ori inal Feasibilit Stud <br />Colorado River Pum in Plant <br />Disbursements to Date for Permittin Studies <br />Remainin Balance <br /> <br />$8,000,000 <br />-$62,500 <br />-$400,000 <br />-$1,110,349 <br />$6,427,151 <br /> <br />A great deal of additional planning work has been done for the project since 1988 (please see the <br />attached project summary) including an environmental impact statement (EIS) which was <br />completed in February 1998 for the Bureau of Land Management (BLM). <br /> <br />The project purpose, as stated in the EIS, is to allow the District to replace the existing pipeline <br />with a facility having sufficient capacity to meet the projected year 2045 peak daily water . <br />demand. After an extensive stakeholder involvement and public comment process, 16 - <br />preliminary alternatives for meeting the project purpose were formulated and evaluated in the <br />EIS. The 16 alternatives were screened to three final alternatives and a no-action alternative that <br />were evaluated at the feasibility-level of detail. A summary of the four alternatives is displayed <br />in Table 3: <br /> <br />Table 3 - Summary of Alternatives from Ute WCD EIS <br /> <br />_~"A1~ <br />Nomina:! Pipeline 48 and 54 <br />piameti!E ql!~,he,s),..", <br />'Pipeline:Lerigth::!iLf':m:':~ <br />"O\1iles f:'::'.;" ',.'. .....i/.!.,:.:i; ::i <br />Capital Cost <br />LifeCYc.leCost (1) ...... <br />Water Supply (Acre- <br />Feet in year 2045) <br />Cost per Acre-FQot.. . <br />Peak DaFlow (MGD) , <br /> <br /> <br />wvJ4'rntmtl <br />24 <br /> <br />",1'39' <br /> <br />$1,387 <br />40.3 <br /> <br />.$1;904 <br />40.3 <br /> <br />$1 ,464 <br />40.3 <br /> <br />$17,135,000 <br />, $29;900;000 <br />12,807 <br /> <br />. . $2,335 <br />18.0 <br /> <br />$30,311 ,000 <br />$34,3QO;QOO . <br />24,727 <br /> <br />$43,161,000 <br />'$47,100,000' <br />24,727 <br /> <br />. $26,656,000 <br />$36,200,000 . <br />24,727 <br /> <br />(1) Present worth of all capital, operating, maintenance and replacement costs for expected life <br />~~~. . <br /> <br />2 <br />