Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />r <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />f <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Draft . Allernative Approach. December 30. 1997 <br />PropoSold Waler RClOurces Act of 1997 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />a) The present and future water needs identified by the local stakeholder <br /> <br />process; <br /> <br />b) <br /> <br />Critical environmental needs (Le. recovery programs. declining species); <br />F;;f\ w'" We+~, ~~+.;-. <br />) "', ' <br /> <br />c) <br /> <br />Administration and compliance with interstate compacts and Supreme <br />Court decrees; <br /> <br />d) <br /> <br />Resolution of critical river administration problems; and <br /> <br />\ , . \(.<,c. <br />y....cJ>~ ./ <br />RiJU <br /> <br />e) Economic, technical and environmental feasibility. <br /> <br />III. <br /> <br />Upon completion of the individual basin and sub-basin efforts. the CWCR and <br />Slate Engineer would analyze the inter-relationshi2; cOl1flict~.!l!l~~rn_patibi-'iti~s <br />among the basin needs and solutions, taking into consideration any identified <br />noneonsumptive use requirements. <br /> <br />IV. <br /> <br />The CWCB and State Engineer would identify the major obstacles to <br />implementation of solutions designed to meet the identified water resources needs <br />as well as possible methods to overcome those identified obstacles, <br /> <br />v. <br /> <br />The CWCB and State Engineer would report to the General Assembly by July l. <br />2000 and recommend the best manner in which to utilize available stale resources <br />to develop and implement identified projects, including any projects which may be <br />necessary to meet nonconsumptive use needs of statewide interest. <br /> <br />2';)"-5 <br /> <br />The report of the CWCB and State Engineer would include an evaluation of <br />