My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00980
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD00980
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:56:29 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:47:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
1/12/1998
Description
1998 Legislative Issues - Water Resources Act of 1998
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />I <br />~ <br />11 <br />,. <br /> <br />'. <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />. <br /> <br />DRAFT <br /> <br />PROPOSED WATER RESOURCES ACT OF 1998 <br />ALTERNATIVE APPROACH <br />DECEMBER 30, 1997 <br /> <br />Section t <br /> <br />The Legislature would direct that the state, through the eWeB and the SEO, would <br />facilitate water project development by assisting in actions that would include, but not be limited <br />to: (I) bringing together intercsted parties within a basin for pUlJloses of project planning; (2) the <br />identification of project alternatives that meet multiple party and multi-purpose needs; and (3) <br />removing impediments 10 project development. such as permitting, political, and environmcntal <br />obstades. In meeting these objectives. the state may also need to take a lead role in identifying <br />the future "nonconsumptive use" needs within the state. The Legislature will need 10 provide <br />state funds for project assessments, environmental analysis, process facilitation, or mitigation. <br />Basically, a five-step process would be followed: <br /> <br />I. The state. through the CWCB, would initially convene local stakeholder-driven <br />processes designed to first identifY present and future consumptive use and non- <br />consumptive use water needs in each identified basin and sub-basin, and then <br />identify and analyze alternative solutions for meeting each area's identified needs. <br />The basins in question would be the Arkansas, Rio Grande, South Platte, and <br />North Platte River basins, as well as the four principal sub-basins of the Colorado <br />R.iver, i.e. the mainstem Colorado, Gunnison, San Juan and Green (Yampa and <br />White). <br /> <br />n. <br /> <br />The CWCB and State Engineer would review the work of the basin groups, <br />including the identified alternatives, for purposes of addrcssing key issues uf <br />statewide interest. Specifically, do the alternatives identified in the stakeholder- <br />driven process address: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.