My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00962
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD00962
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:56:19 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:47:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
11/10/1953
Description
Minutes
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />269 <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />Basin complaint on water quality~ (b) Comparatively <br />speaking with the other reservoirs the silting up pro- <br />blem of Curecanti is much lesser. The expectant period <br />of usefulness and consequent cost of project should be <br />spread over a much longer span of years. (c) The evapora- <br />tion factor is very favorable to Gurecanti meaning of the <br />water stored there a greater percentage of it will serve <br />a beneficial use. Surely i5,000,000 should be credited to <br />Curecanti when attempting to arrive at its feasibility on <br />a comparative basis. For these reasons we are convinced <br />this Gunnison Storage Project is economically sound as a <br />National Investment. It would be located in and of ser- <br />vice to a vast domain of high mineralized and forest <br />covered mountains, and valleys of productive soil that <br />with adequate additional water and power will support <br />several fold its present population of families. <br /> <br />The Cf"rteria of feasibility must take in account these <br />factors. Further expansion of agriculture and industry <br />in this upper basin is a corrolary to hold-over storage. <br />To spell this out - the tools of additional water and <br />power must be provided here available for this expansion <br />in Western Colorado for this storage project to have any <br />recognizable meaning to the Western Slope area. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />This is where Curecanti fits in as a most important opinion <br />in this hold-over storage device. <br /> <br />Expansion in irrigation that the Curecanti Storage <br />would make possible. <br /> <br />huch irrigated area of the Uncompahgre only 60 to <br />70% efficient in production because of water shortage in <br />that valley. <br /> <br />Now irrigates about 80,000 acres, 70,000 of this in <br />Gunnison Valley project. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />600,000 acre-feet of water used nbw on farmers in <br />Delta, Olathe, etc. in Uncompahgre Valley. <br /> <br />Acreage yet to be developed about 50,000 in boundary <br />of project and between 5000 and 6000 acres on Grand Mesa <br />and adjacent to projects on south and west. <br /> <br />Total of 390,000 acre-feet for irrigation". <br /> <br />Mr. Peterson then introduced Mr. Leonard Huber, City Manager <br />of Delta, Colorado, who made a brief statement in favor <br />of the Curecanti Project. <br /> <br />Mr. H. R. Holliday, Chairman, Delta County Water <br />Advisory Board, Delta, Colorado was next introduced, and <br />he read the following statement to the board: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.