BOARD00961 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

SEeDO.SIX Final Two Organizational Alternatives Table 7 (cont'd) Comparison of Stand Alone Grand Junction Drainage District and Drainage Authority with the Grand Junction Drainage District as an Operational Arm Cl C2 Issue Drainage Authority with Grand Grand Junction Drainage Comments Junction Drainal!e District District 5. Initial Boundaries The initial boundaries would be Existing boundaries include about The new organization could be limited to the established in the contract 90% of the study area. Boundary boundaries of the District. establishing a Drainage expansion would require: Authority. 1. Property owners agreement, or 2. New state legislation 6. Boundary Expansion Boundary Expansion would be Same as above. accomplished by amending the contract between the 5 entities. This would require agreement of the elected officials of the entities. 7. Operations outside of Not necessary. hut could be done Not allowed in the existing boundary if the enabling contract grants a statute. Drainage Authority the authority to work outside its boundaries. 8. Collection of funds from Not as necessary because No authority to do so unless areas outside boundary boundaries are greater than collected by local jurisdiction. District) but could only do so if agreed to by local jurisdiction. 9. What limitalions can be The Drainage Authority contract Only those stated in the District The limitations for the District can only be those in placed on the can specify limitations, subject to statute. the existing statute unless the statute is changed by organization statutory requirements. state legislation. Limitations can be customized to fit what the five entities want in a Drainage Authority contract. T:\PROJECTS\22236022_ GRAND_ VALLEY\SUB_OO\6.0_PROJ_OELlWINAL REPORnFINAL REPT REV 4.DOC\9-JUL-03\\ 6-6