Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />for approval of case No. 5-91CW201, Miller, the staff recommendations and stipulations <br />as presented to us in the October 23rd memo. The motion passed by unanimous (8-0) <br />decision with one abstention. <br /> <br />13f. <br /> <br />Instream Flow Program: Stipulations, Case No. 6-92CW023; Steamboat Springs* <br />(10:52 - 10:55 a.m.) . <br /> <br />Dan Merriman reviewed the case history. Questions were asked by Jackson and <br />Lochhead. Harrison and Martineau commented on the suitability of the site. A motion <br />was made by Smith and seconded by Sheftel to approve the staff recommendation. The <br />motion passed by unanimous (9-0) decision. <br /> <br />13g. Instream Flow Program: Stipulations, Case No. 7-90CW075; McGuigan* <br />(10:55 - 10:58 a.m.) <br /> <br />Dan Merriman reviewed the case history. Questions were asked by Wright. A motion <br />was made by Wright and seconded by Sheftel to approve the stipulation with the <br />condition that the apparent typographical errors be corrected before approval. The motion <br />passed by unanimous (9-0) decision. . <br /> <br />18ab. Instream Flow Program: Staff Actions, Case No. 1-92CW074; Deem and <br />Case No. 1-92CW087; Davis* (10:58 - 11:00 a.m.) <br /> <br />Dan Merriman reviewed staff actions and the staff recommendation in each case not to <br />file a statement of opposition. A motion was made by Sheftel and seconded by Evans <br />to approve the staff recommendation in these cases. The motion passed by unanimous <br />decision (9-0). <br /> <br />19. Instream Flow Program: Withdrawal of Statements of Opposition, Case Nos. 4- <br />92CW013 and 014; Specie Mesa Land Co.* (11:00 - 11:02 a.m.) <br /> <br />Dan Merriman reviewed the case history and the staff recommendation that the Board <br />direct the AG's staff to withdraw the statements of opposition filed in these two cases. <br />A motion was made by Smith and seconded by Harrison to approve the staff <br />recommendation. The motion passed by unanimous decision (9-0). <br /> <br />21abe. Floodplain Management Issues, Floodplain Resolutions No. 92-332, 92-333, <br />and 92-336* (11:02 - 11:06 a.m.) <br /> <br />a. Flood Insurance Study, Town of Palisade, Mesa County, Colorado, by FEMA, <br />dated July 15. 1992; Floodplain Resolution No. 92-332 <br /> <br />Nov. 1992 Meeting, page 11 <br />