Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Biological Data <br /> <br />The CDOW has conducted field surveys of the fishery resources on this stream and have found a <br />natural environment that can be preserved. As reported for this reach of stream in CDOW'S <br />recommendation letter to the CWCB, "Cornet Creek was sampled using standard electrofishing <br />equipment approximately 118 mile above the confluence with the San Miguel River. The aquatic <br />sampling summary (See CDOW Fish Survey in Appendix B - on the field data sheet) shows that <br />a self sustaining brook and brown trout fishery exists in Cornet Creek. Cornet Creek also has a <br />healthy aquatic macroinvertebrate population indicative of high quality water. Cornet Creek also <br />supports a healthy riparian community. Instream flows are needed to preserve and protect these <br />biological communities in addition to the existing brook and brown trout fishery. Cornet Creek <br />also produces high quality water that serves to provide assurance that mine clean-up activities in <br />the upper San Miguel basin (above the Town of Telluride) will continue to show improvements <br />to the river's water quality and the river's fish population." <br /> <br />Field Survey Data <br /> <br />CDOW and CWCB staff used the R2CROSS methodology to quantify the amount of water <br />required to preserve the natural environment to a reasonable degree. The R2CROSS method <br />requires that stream discharge and channel profile data be collected in a riffle stream habitat type. <br />Riffles are most easily visualized as the stream habitat types that would dry up first should <br />streamflow cease. This type of hydraulic data collection consists of setting up a transect, <br />surveying the stream channel geometry, and measuring the stream discharge. Appendix B <br />contains copies of field data collected for this proposed segment. <br /> <br />Biological Flow Recommendations <br /> <br />The CWCB staff relied upon the biological expertise of the cooperating agencies to interpret <br />output from the R2Cross data collected to develop the initial, biologic instream flow <br />recommendation. This initial recommendation is designed to address the unique biologic <br />requirements of each stream without regard to water availability. Three in stream flow hydraulic <br />parameters, average depth, percent wetted perimeter, and average velocity, are used to develop <br />biologic instream flow recommendations. The CDOW has determined that maintaining these <br />three hydraulic parameters at adequate levels across riffle habitat types, aquatic habitat in pools <br />and runs will also be maintained for most life stages of fish and aquatic invertebrates (Nehring <br />1979; Espegren 1996). <br /> <br />For this segment of stream, one data set was collected with the results shown in Table I below. <br />Table I shows who collected the data (Party), the date the data was collected (Date), the <br />measured discharge at the time of the survey (Q), the accuracy range of the predicted flows <br />based on Manning Equation (240% and 40% of Q), the summer flow recommendation based on <br />meeting 3 of 3 hydraulic criteria and the winter flow recommendation based upon 2 of 3 <br />hydraulic criteria. <br /> <br />Table I: Data <br /> <br />Party Date Q 250% -40% Summer (3/3) Winter (2/3) <br />DOW/CWCB 10/08/96 3.93 9.8 - 1.6 9.0 3.5 <br /> <br />BLM = Bureau of Land Management DOW = Division of Wildlife <br />(1) Predicted flow outside of the accuracy range of Malll1ing's Equation. <br /> <br />CWCB = Colorado Water Conservation Board <br />? = Criteria never met in R2CROSS Staging Table. <br /> <br />Biologic Flow Recommendations <br />The CDOW recommended a 9.0 cfs summer flow and a 3.5 cfs winter flow based on the October <br />8, 1996, data collection efforts. Staff reviewed the data collected by the CDOW. The summer <br /> <br />- 3 - <br />