My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00902
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD00902
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:55:06 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:45:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
1/23/2002
Description
Request for Comments on "Whether the Anti-Speculation Doctrine Applies Within the Denver Basin Aquifers of the Designated Basins
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />STATE OF COLORADO <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Colorado Water Conservation Board <br /> <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 721 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: (303) 866-3441 <br />FAX: (303) 866.4474 <br />www.cwcb.state.co.us <br /> <br /> <br />Bill Owens <br />Governor <br /> <br />To: <br /> <br />CWCB Members <br /> <br />GregE, Walcher <br />Executive Director <br /> <br />From: Rod Kuharich, Dan McAuliffe, Dan Merriman, Ted Kowalski <br /> <br />Rod Kuharich <br />CWCB Director <br /> <br />Date: January 14,2002 <br /> <br />Dan McAuliffe <br />Deputy Director <br /> <br />Re: Agenda Item IS.e, January 23-24, 200~ Board Meeting, Request for Comments on <br />"Whether the Auti-Speculation doctrille applies within the Denver Basin Aquifers of <br />the Designated Basins" <br /> <br />In December, 2001, we received the attached memorandum from William Fronczak <br />requesting comments about whether the anti-speculation doctrine applies within the Denver Basin <br />aquifers of the Designated Basins, This issue is currently before a Designated Ground Water Judge, <br />This case may be appealed to the Colorado Supreme Court, and eventually that ruling could have <br />implications about the Denver Basin aquifers outside of the Designated Basins, Consequently, we <br />. thought that you may want to have an opportunity to discuss issue. <br /> <br />As you know, Senate Bill 5 (passed in 1985) provided that water in the Denver Basin <br />aquifers would be allocated based on overlying lllI1d ownership, As such, it has been a widely held <br />belief that the anti-speculation doctrine either does not apply in the Denver basin aquifers, or that if <br />the anti-speculation doctrine applies, it is an easier standard to satisfY, The Colorado Supreme <br />Court, arguably, called into question this logic when it held in the Chatfield East decision: <br /> <br />A water right is aright of use, " ,the general assembly and the courts of this state have often <br />reinforced the policy of keeping the public water resource available to those who can and will <br />use it beneficially, as opposed'to those wl10 wish to speculate in its value and price. Even <br />though Denver Basin groundwater is managed differently from waters of the natural stream <br />the Groundwater Management Act mirrors the anti-speculation, beneficial use, non-waste <br />precepts of Colorado Law, <br /> <br />While this language is almost certainly dicta, the issue not absolutely decided one way or the other, <br />The Staff, and Hal Simpson, will be available to !lllswer any questions and follow-up on the Board's <br />decisions regarding this matter. <br /> <br />Attachment <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Flood Protection. Water Supply Planning and Finance. Stream and Lake Protection <br />Water Supply Protection. Conservation and Drought Planning <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.