Laserfiche WebLink
<br />28 <br /> <br />QOl.llJIluntty through the Chamber o-t Commerce, through a water ~om- <br />mittse they havs,their~oard Of County Oommissioners, Ith1nk, <br /> <br />are involved in it, and aeveral of our service groupe, expressed <br />a et:t'O,ne; des1re not to have the Gunnison Rlver flooded from_ <br />OUt'flOant1upstl'Balll. The buts tor tb,at 1s they have about 5000 <br />aares of' r1ver bottolll and othe1" landthqt would be flooded. <br />'hat 18a large proportion, a9 I remember 1t, of the irripted <br />area in the ~~ty .ofGunnlson. <br />Some 15; 1 th1nk wae the figure I gave, resorts would be <br />,flooded, and it would Change the wholeplctul'e 'from a stream <br />fishing areA to l!lJte fleh1ng. We have as "et had no definite <br />proposal from the Bureau of tteclamat10n in eonnecUon with the <br />looationO't the dd on the upper Gunnison. <br />,At Grand Junotlon somethlng ~round three montha ago. we <br />bad a lIleeUng and at that t1l1le Hr. Jex asked 11" you could-give <br />us the Informatlon on the proposed def1n1te lOGation, and we <br />tUdn<>t ~t that information. Up to date, as tar al!l ,I know" <br />there h~9 been nothing but conjecture 1n~o~ar as the e1t1e8ns <br />of the Oounty of Gunnison llJ"e oOllloerned or the re9t of us on the <br />Westen Slone IUl towhet'$ the droll was to be located. Mr. alter <br />, . , <br /> <br />says where 1t should be located. fbat information should be <br /> <br />put out to get definite 1'eaot10n of all the peOple involved. <br /> <br />Oel"ta1nly, the1'e 19 11 oonsiderable group over there that w~u1d <br /> <br />ratheI' have the storage on the upper end. When we talk abOut <br /> <br />spending ~ouQd a hundl'ed m1.1110l1 dollar9 of the t~paye!'sl <br />