Laserfiche WebLink
<br />24 <br /> <br />the reservoirs. It would neither preolude nor would it demand <br />cel'ta1n speoif1e development!! upstream. However, anything that <br />doee ocour upstream would enhance the value of the Bridgeport <br />Reservoir. <br />~, believe that's all X have. <br />, MR. STONE: ' Will you, explain 1n rart1culaJ" the itelll which <br />1 thought Wall of oonsiderable lnterest about the power rate 1n <br />connection wlth Eoh() Pa.:rk. <br />MR., JAOOBSON: We expeot to dell vera lR.rge blook of the <br />energy at EoJ'lo Park lnto the 01 tyof Grand Junot1on. That would <br />ental1 a tl'Mmnls!!lon Une. If' a power ple.nt is located 1n the <br />vi01n1ty ot Grand Junction, that would elevate eonAldere,bl, the <br />cost of that Une. Bridgeport Rese1"\Tolr power setup h not. <br />highly deslrable power plant. It 19 an eoonomical power plant, <br />but it dOM not compare with Eoho PArk; but that Une, that <br />po''''er plant, 1t oarried into the Echo PArk setup, (loflel'l' t bArdly <br />lnfluence the rate .01' over-all rate or thE' basls of it. Stand- <br />ing by 1't;se1f. lt 1soostly power, but opflratlng ln the siet:.~ <br />1t oan be~e~ eas11~ Justified and would be en BaRet for de- <br />l1vem< of ene:rgy to the section ot Colorado around Grand JunctlQn, <br />Montrose, and over to Gunnison. <br />Does that answer your q,uest1on, Judget <br />MR. llAILEr: DOBS a,nyone have any questions or MY'. Riter <br />or Mr.lll.Oobeon'l <br />MR. ROOltES: As I have brought up before, the Gunn1eon <br />