Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Wildlife Drought Task Force: Attached is a summary. of drought impacts and activities reported by the . <br />Wildlife Drought Task Force during August. A key point made at the August Task Force meeting was to <br />plan for the drought continuing into next year. The long-term forecasts are very uncertain, and there is <br />no indication that the drought conditions will subside. <br /> <br />In addition to the actions reported in the attached memo, the DOW has also entered into an agreement <br />with the Conejos Water Conservancy District. The District has agreed to release an additional 4 cfs <br />(over inflow) from storage inPlatoro Reservoir. This agreement will be in effect until October 1st at <br />which time the District will revert to winter operation~ and will be required to maintain a release of 7 <br />cfs. CDOW will provide replacement water to the District, when available, from other sources. <br /> <br />Arkansas River Basin Issues <br /> <br />RICD By-pass Flow Letter: After you made your findings and recommendations concerning Pueblo's <br />RlCD application you asked us to draft a letter to the <;ongressiona1 delegation expressing your views <br />about tying a federal by-pass flow requirement to the legislation allowing Pueblo Reservoir to be <br />enlarged. We have drafted a letter and I have attached:it for your review. <br /> <br />Arkansas River TMDL: Kansas Water Quality Representative Tom Stiles has informed Colorado that <br />the State of Kansas has listed the Arkansas River below the stateline as impaired for selenium. The <br />selenium loading in the Arkansas River is overwhelmingly due to natural or irreversible conditions. <br />Potential reductions in selenium loading from agricultural uses are at best marginal, especially in light of <br />the fact that water use efficiency improvements are generally in conflict with the provisions ofthe <br />Arkansas River Compact. . <br /> <br />Support for New Conservancy District: Members of the Arkansas Valley Water Preservation group . <br />have completed a poll indicating that of 502 Colorado adult registered voters from Bent, Crowley, <br />Otero, Prowers and Pueblo counties likely to vote in the November general election, 79 percent would <br />vote in favor of a creating a new district. <br /> <br />People want to create a new district that would purch~se agriculture water rights to keep them from <br />being converted to other uses. To buy water, the cons\Jrvancy district must ask voters for a property tax <br />increase. According to the poll, respondents showed l! high tolerance for a I-mill increase but a low <br />tolerance for a 2-mill increase. Based on that information the Water Preservation Group decided in favor <br />of setting a levy of 1.5 mills, with a 30-year "sunset" clause. <br /> <br />The group had already submitted petitions to the Pueo10 District Court to form a new conservancy <br />district, but are re-petitioning to seek approval of a tax levee as well. Members of the group from each <br />county have taken new petitions to be completed by tl1e time a hearing on the petitions is held on Sept. <br />9. <br /> <br />SEWCD Seeks General Manager: The Southeastern Colorado Water Conservancy District <br />(SECWCD) is seeking qualified applicants for the po~ition of General Manager. Resumes must be <br />submitted by Sept. 30. For more information visit the District's web site. <br /> <br />Letter from the Publisher: Attached for your information is a letter to Greg Hoskin from Pueblo <br />Chieftain publisher Bob Rawlings indicating his editorial stance against the Board prior to your making <br />findings and recommendations concerning the Pueblo RICD application was wrong. <br /> <br />Pipeline Study: On Aug. 1 it was announced that tM U.S. Senate Appropriations Committee has <br />approved $200,000 in "start-up funding" for the Ark~nsas Valley Conduit study. The study would be the. <br />first step toward building a $200 million pipeline. T* pipeline was originally authorized along with the <br />Frying-pan Arkansas Project in 1962, but was never built because users could not afford to pay for it. As <br /> <br />12 <br />