Board Meeting 10/07/1982

• Board Meeting Date: 10/7/1982
• Description: CWCB Meeting
• Board Meetings - Doc Type: Meeting

,-'\

:.-...-.-'._'---~'--- -

2

, ,

. puroose

Non-Federal Share of c~oital Costs

Urban and rural flood
orotection and
rural drainage

Variable (no less than 3S percent)

Agricultural water

Variable (no ~ess than 3S percent)
depending on benefits to users

Recreation (ex~luding.
cost:> for Uli.Ui.IUUlll
safety and sanitation

50* p~a.:~!1t ur Juli)t ~H,l
....:.~~ts

5eoArabla
.

J::__..:,:....:_...
..c:a........"-.c..a

Municipal water

100 percent of costs

"

(Su~ject of pending legislation)

(lCO percent project cost
allocated in ..proportion to --
project. co.sts)

lOC percent ot costs

Nav~9ation

Fish and Wildlife
.. ,
r.1l !.lgatlon

Fish and Wildlife
enhancement

Industrial wa~er

110 less t' m 100 percent

Hydroelectric powa;

F~i~ately :inanced

No less than 100 percent .

Payment for right to use a federal
facility for partnership
arrangement

I

public.1y financec

,

Opera~ion and ~aintenance costs would be the responsibility of
beneficiaries.

The principles behind these proposals are:

1. In general, recipients of services or benefits should pay for
the cOSt of those, services.

" _ 2. In cases where the value of water service. is greater than the
cost, consideration should be given to recovery of more than
project cost.

3. Certain services, such as agricultural water and flood
control, need a greater degree of leeway. However, they still
should be required to pay a significant portion of the cost. ~he
35 percent minimum figure used here .will be raised where the
irrigator gets great~r benefits (based on the benefits estimated
. .;... ......p c-s--'o enc'::;" t!.......;.. I.~e,.: ..... ~..e..: c.. ..L..e -~o" e~-\
... _~l_ .J _ I ...... ~........... \,,6.;) ..... ...>.,; J................. ...~1 ~.. .........
___..Il_~';,...-~'- .:::::--.-~""~':t~.. .. _.'~ .~ .. ..'
Q~E~';~;?r~2~2Z"~0~t.=';:'7f;:~~~~~~~~~~:~~'~::::'"