My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00836
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD00836
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:54:30 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:44:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
9/6/1956
Description
Minutes and Resolution
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />473 <br /> <br />MR. KOBES: <br /> <br />MR. MOSES: <br /> <br />MR. SWEET: <br /> <br />- 18 - <br /> <br />"I am not aware of that. Is that under <br />this.plan'?" <br /> <br />"This plan. I would like Mr. Sweet to <br />outline, if this 60 feet were granted in the <br />, winter, the number of acres which would have <br />to be taken out of the project. The farmers <br />are going to pay for this." <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />. <br />"We dealt with the State--Dean Crawford <br />and his staff--on negotiating with the State <br />Game and Fish Commission in regards to <br />this release. With a release of 60 second <br />feet, except when the inflow gets less than <br />that, there would be 8000 acre feet on the <br />average going down the river in the winter- <br />time.' By reducing the 60 second feet by <br />the amount of the Goose,Creek inflows which <br />enter the river'a mile below, 'we find we would <br />have an average of about 5000 acre feet <br />released. Insofar as possible we have done <br />everything to mitigate the damages except <br />let that water down the river. It belongs <br />to the'farmers and not the Bureau. So we : <br />look "to the Water Board. The best deal <br />we could arrive at was 5000 acre feet <br />a year: "that we would have to turn down. The <br />only place to get the 5000 acre feet is take <br />two thousand acres out of cultivation in that <br />area, and as far as the Bureau is concerned <br />that is not within our sphere of operation; <br />If the State says we want to do that, we would <br />do it. That water is over-appropriated on <br />the river now. That is what it would amount <br />to. Two to three thousand acres of the land <br />would have to go out of cultivation, reduced <br />by the'Goose Creek wateL. Goose Creek comes <br />in about a mile below the dam and actually <br />the winter flow, we estimate, is in the <br />neighborhood of 15 second feet. Whether tha~ <br />would still be too little I don't know. But <br />it narrows down to that one problem, that if" <br />y.ou find two to three thousand acres of : <br />land to take out of irrigation and some junior <br />appropriator did not claim the water, you <br />would have something to turn loose in the <br />winter. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />We had difficulties in the period of 1930 <br />to 1940 and continued our operation study; <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.