My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00822
CWCB
>
Chatfield Mitigation
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD00822
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:54:24 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:44:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
4/27/1953
Description
Minutes and Resolution
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />147 <br /> <br />Mr. Breitenstein said, "Certainly, so far as we I" <br />people who live in the San Juan Basin are concerned"they <br />have been very cooperative with New Mexico, and I <br />personally would certainly not wish to do anything that <br />would have a tendency to make those people become averse <br />to us. Try to work together and get along together. State <br />line ~hould not cause a division in projects which interest <br />both Colorado and New Me~i"co. . I think Mr. Riter's suggestion <br />is very acceptable to me. We must negotiate with New Mexico." <br /> <br />Mr. Dille seconded'the motion that Mr. Crawford <br />write to New Mexico re~arding its views with respect to <br />the La Plata-Animas Project. <br /> <br />The motion was unanimously c~Iried. <br /> <br />Mr. Bailey introduced Mr. John Goeffrey Will, Attorney <br />for the Upper Colorado River Commission to express his <br />views with regard to aqtivities of the Commission. <br /> <br />Mr. Will made.the following statement: "I think <br />that this Board is entitled to a report from me regarding <br />the activities of the Commission. In view of the Board's <br />demonstrated intere~t in the Colorado River Storage Project, <br />I have just returned from spending a few days in Washington <br />to attempt to find out the status of the Colorado River " <br />Storage Project in the Department of the Interior. In that <br />connection I had conferences with Asst." Secretary Arndahl <br />and a number of other officials of the Department. As a <br />result of those conferences I am very encouraged. . I don't <br />like to make predictions - presUmptuous to make them, but <br />I can go out on a limb and say that in my judgment the report <br />of the Department of the Interior on that project will be <br />released within two weeks to the Bureau of "the Budget. While <br />r was in Washington r had the opportunity to note, superficially <br />of course, because time was limited, the figures of the reduced <br />appropriations for the functions of the Bureau of Reclamation <br />in the West, recommended by the Interior Sub-committee of the <br />House Committee on Appropriations. Now r know, of course, <br />that annually at about this time we are accustomed to 1 <br />receiving the report of the Interior Sub-committee of the <br />House Committee on Appropriations in regard to cutting on <br />expenditures and consequently on programs for the 17 western <br />states. But of course we are accustomed, too, to relaxing <br />a bit, realizing that the true friends of the West, and you <br />understand of course that I am speaking from a non-partisan <br />point of vie~ tqe tr.ue friend of the West, ~ho~e who understand <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.