Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Fourmile Creek from the confluence with the Arkansas River to the three new points of diversion <br />and a 30 cfs exchange to Wrights Reservoir (a.k.a. Pisgah Reservoir). CCVGM did not specify <br />any appropriation date for this exchange. CWCB and AGO staff have reviewed the CCVGM's <br />settlement proposal and have the following comments: <br />1) CCVGM's three conditional water rights are junior to the Board's four Fourmile Creek instream <br />flow recommendations. <br />2) CCVGM's proposed exchanges would be junior to the Board's Fourmile instream flow <br />recommendations. It is staff's opinion that ESF could only run their exchanges when the Board's <br />Fourmile Creek ISF recommendations were satisfied. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. City of Cripple Creek (CCC) - Staff met with representatives from the CCC to try and resolve <br />any issues both parties may have. To date CCC has not provided the staffwith any proposed <br />settlement. <br /> <br />. The Pisgah Reservoir and Ditch Company and Catlin Canal Company (pRDC) - PRDC has <br />contacted the CWCB (see attached letter) with concerns regarding the effects of the proposed <br />instream flow recommendations on existing water rights. The PRDC also requests that satellite <br />monitored measuring stations be installed and maintained at the expense of the State to measure <br />the flow in the proposed reaches. <br /> <br />. Fourmile Creek Water Users (FCWU) - Staff met with several FCWU on November 9, 1998, <br />for a field inspection and to provide information regarding the Board's proposed instream flow <br />recommendations and address local water user concerns. At this meeting staffheard a wide range <br />of concerns regarding the possible effect of the proposed ISF recommendations on existing water . <br />rights. It was the general consensus that people were not opposed to having water in the stream <br />but they were opposed to anything that may prevent them from moving/selling their water rights <br />to upstream points. Staff is expecting written comments from the FCWU prior to the Board <br />meeting. <br /> <br />Tennessee Creek <br />Prior to the Board taking final action on this recommendation, pursuant to rule 12, the staff sought <br />and received comments and concerns from the Pueblo Board of Water Works and the Eagle Sky <br />Foundation, Inc. <br /> <br />The following facts are based on the best available data to date: <br /> <br />. The DOW documented that a natural environment is present in the form of a brook, <br />brown, rainbow and cutthroat trout fishery. <br /> <br />. Based on the DOW's biological recommendation, flows of 19 cfs, summer, and 9 cfs, <br />winter, are necessary to preserve the natural environment to a reasonable degree. <br />However, the winter instrearn flow recommendation was reduced to 7 cfs (12/1-5/14) <br />based on the water availability analysis. The DOW believes the lower flow <br />recommendation will still preserve the natural environment. <br /> <br />Page 4 of7 <br /> <br />. <br />