My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00800
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00800
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:54:10 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:44:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
7/2/1957
Description
Minutes
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />/jU <br /> <br />HR. MOSES: <br /> <br />MR. PETERSON: <br /> <br />MR. CRAWFORD <br /> <br />Since Colorado's portion of water <br />under the Colorado River Storage Project <br />Act is over 51%, the people in my area <br />feel that the appropriation should be <br />made in the next Session of Congress at <br />least. Another project that should re- <br />ceive attention is the Curecanti. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />1 would like to recommend this pro- <br />cedure. That when Congress adjourns <br />this summer or fall, that we attempt to <br />get together all of our Congressional <br />delegation, Mr. Chilson, Mr. Dexheimer <br />and anyone else that might be of benefit <br />to us and meet with this Board:and try <br />to outline a procedure whereby Colorado <br />will not be left out in the next Congress." <br /> <br />"1 would be in favor of that and of <br />even going a little further. 1 have <br />always found that if you had some water <br />mmrs in the area on the ground that it <br />meant more to those people than all the <br />staff members or lawyers you could possi- <br />bly send. <br /> <br />They don't necessarily have to do <br />the talking but if they are there, the <br />people who are concerned will know there <br />is that much local interest. 1 would <br />suggest this rather than just having the <br />members of our Board. <br /> <br />The Project that is certainly entitled <br />to an early appropriation is the Paonia. <br />1 would suggest a meeting with the Board, <br />of those people mentioned by Mr. Peterson <br />at Montrose, Gunnison, Delta or some other <br />town close to those areas." <br /> <br />"That would be fine if we can get <br />our full Congressional Delegation to go <br />to any of those places but if it is <br />easier to get them together in Denver, <br />then let's have it here." <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />."We shouldn't overlook the Curecanti <br />at this time. I agree the best thing to <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.