My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00763
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00763
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:53:58 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:43:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
5/19/2003
Description
CF Section - New Loans - Willow Heights Irrigation Company - Dual Water Rehabilitation
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Upper Platte and Beaver Canal Company <br />May 19-20, 2003 <br /> <br />Agenda Item 18e <br /> <br /> <br />Water Riahts <br />The UPBCC has a 234 cfs direct flow right out of the South Platte River consisting of a 20 cfs <br />right (1868/1869), a 50 cfs right (1882), and a 164 cfs ~ight (1888). In addition, the UPBCC has <br />a 1972 augmentation decree allowing diversion of up to 12,000 acre-feet per year. According to <br />State Engineer records UPBCC annual diversions have averaged 30,000 acre feet for irrigation <br />and approximately 2,500 acre feet for augmentation. The Company can use its augmentation <br />decree (dated 1972) to supply water to this new project. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Proiect Description <br />Three alternatives were analyzed in the feasibility study: <br /> <br />1. The no-action alternative <br />2. Purchase a senior water right and use it for augmentation ($1 million) <br />3. Construct two recharge ponds ($75,000) <br /> <br />Alternative 2, Purchase a senior water right and use it'for augmentation ($1 million), <br />was ruled out due to cost. Alternative 3, Construct two' recharge ponds ($75,000), was the <br />preferred alternative, since it was the least overall cost to provide the augmentation water <br />needed to offset well depletions. The no-action alternative was considered unacceptable since it <br />provides no firm source of augmentation water for 93 Irrigation wells, and could result in the <br />loss of up to 12,000 acre feet of water per year, if drought conditions persist. <br /> <br />Selected Alternative 2 involves construction of two reClharge ponds on Badger Creek, <br />immediately north of the Upper Platte and Beaver Canal. The ponds will be in series and <br />formed by constructing 2 non-jurisdictional dams. Eaoh dam will be equipped with an <br />emergency spillway and a gated outlet to control augr)1entation releases. An existing turnout on . <br />the Upper Platte and Seaver Canal will be modified and equipped with a measuring device for <br />releases into the upper pond. Four measuring weirs will also be constructed at the ends of the <br />UPBCC system to properly track water leaving the canal system. <br /> <br />The implementation schedule calls for completion of financing arrangements and final <br />engineering design in April 2003. Construction will be: completed in May 2003. <br /> <br />Financial Analvsls <br />The total estimated cost of the project is $75,000, an~ the shareholders use the water for <br />agricultural purposes. The Company has requested C! 10-year Small Project loan in maximum <br />amount of $67,500 (90% of estimated project cost.) <br /> <br />Table 1 is a summary of the financial aspects of the project. A CWCB Loan of $67,500 would <br />have an annual payment of $8,374 (including the 10% reserve requirement) at the loan terms of <br />2.25% for 10 years. This represents $0.26 per acre-fpot, based on average canal diversions of <br />32,500 acre-feet. <br />Table 1. Financial 'Summa <br /> <br /> <br />$75,000 <br />100 <br />1187 <br />$67,500 <br />$8,374 <br />$75,00 <br />$82.00 <br />$0.26 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.