Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />exposing a residual gypsum cap which covers about 15,000 feet of nearly <br />pure salt and salt-rich shale. <br /> <br />The geologic development of the valley is somewhat unique. Briefly <br />stated, the emergence of distant mountainous uplifts on each side of <br />the area has placed intense lateral pressures on the intervening <br />sedimentary formations, resulting in warping and fracturing along weak <br />zones. Under these pressures and the weight of the overlying formations, <br />a deeply buried layer of salt (Paradox Member) from an ancient inland <br />sea has flowed upward into the fractured area of the fold to create an <br />elongated swell known as an anticline. As this has taken place, the . <br />Dolores River has remained in its original streambed and, in conjunction <br />with weathering and erosion, has removed the upper materials to form <br />the valley. These geological processes are still active today in the <br />valley. <br /> <br />Ground water comes into contact with the top of the salt formation, <br />where it becomes nearly saturated, and surfaces as salt brine in the <br />channel of the Dolores River near the middle of. the valley. The effect <br />of the brine varies considerably, depending upon the amount of water <br />in the river. High riverflows mix with and considerably dilute the <br />brine; consequently, the salt content of the stream may increase from <br />250 milligrams per liter (mg/l) as it enters the valley to 450 mg/l as <br />it exits the valley. With low riverflows, however, the salinity of <br />the river increases from 1,000 mg/l to as high as 166,000 mg/l (approxi- <br />mately five times as saline as sea water) as it crosses Paradox Valley. <br /> <br />Possible OontrolMeasures <br /> <br />The Bureau of Reclamation is studying possible methods of controlling <br />the movement of brine ground water. Several of the alternatives involve <br />drilling a series of wells along the river near mid-valley. Prior <br />tests have indicated that pumping from the wells would reduce the water <br />pressure and prevent most of the brine from surfacing in the riverbed. <br />The brine from the wells could then be piped to one or more solar <br />evaporation ponds for evaporation. Another alternative would be to <br />inject the brine away from ground water movement into the salt dome <br />at mid-valley or into deep wells outside the area. Appropriate sites <br />for injection have not yet been identified, and this way of disposal <br />may only be a short term alternative to solar evaporation. <br /> <br />Another measure being considered involves routing the Dolores River <br />across the valley in a lined channel and allowing the ground water to <br />surface and evaporate in the natural floodplain. The required facil- <br />ities would be designed to accommodate the high spring floods of the <br />river. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Before these and other plans can be adequately assessed, additional <br />research must be conducted to acquire more information about the <br />sources, behavior, and chemical composition of the ground water. While <br />investigations are being conducted, coordination .will be maintained <br />with appropriate state agencies and the Paradox Valley Unit Advisory <br />Team, a local interest group. The selection of a final plan will be <br /> <br />-27- <br />