Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />47 <br /> <br />And now those are most of my fquestions. Can I get <br />any of them answered or do you have any of the answers? <br /> <br />CHAIRMAN KROEGER: Any questions coming from the <br /> <br />Board? <br /> <br />MR. JACKSON: One question. Bill, wouldn't there <br />prospective use of that for those 20,000 acres be senior <br /> <br />to this decree? I assume that is a decree they've had for <br /> <br />some time. <br /> <br />MR. McDONALD: I likewise make the assumption, Bob, <br /> <br />that they have an outstanding senior conditional decrees <br /> <br />that would go finally. If some or any part of that 20,000 <br /> <br />acres is ever to be brought under irrigation and to the <br /> <br />extent those are senior rights, there is no way that the <br /> <br />Board filing can have any impact on your senior rights <br />whatsoever by definition. <br />MR. GETZ: Wouldn't the problem we have now is <br /> <br />some of the same concerns on Rio Grande that he's expressed <br /> <br />here and even though they have a conditional right, a junior <br /> <br />decree would have some say so about the diversion, the point <br /> <br />of idversions and et cetera of these senior decrees, would <br /> <br /> <br />they not, or change of point of the conditional decrees? <br /> <br /> <br />MR. McDONALD: Well, if we filed an application <br /> <br /> <br />we'd have the same standing as, you know, any other water <br /> <br /> <br />right owner. <br /> <br />MR. GETZ: I know but -- <br />