My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00647
CWCB
>
Chatfield Mitigation
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00647
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:52:46 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:42:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
8/15/1973
Description
Agenda or Table of Contents, Minutes, Memos
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Mr. reh Eyck: I have a couple of questions I would like to ask <br />Mr. Brannan. You mentioned the dedication of a sufficient amount <br />but you haven't defined the quantity of water to maintain a viable <br />stream. Do you have any numbers on that? <br /> <br />Mr. Brannan: No, sir. We intend to corne talk to your office. But <br />please remember now that (Well, I don't think it is a secret in this <br />'assembly) Rocky Mountain Power Cc~pany is practically without finan- <br />cial resources. We spent three million dollaro and we have run out <br />of financial resources. We don't have the staff to do all of the <br />jobs at the same time and we are taking them in sequence. If we can <br />establish the needs of the oil shale industry and also the coal <br />gasification industry, then I think we can say all that we can supply <br />so and so because of our commitments to the state of Colorado, the <br />Forest Service and all of the rest of the agencies which will be <br />looking over our shoulder s.ll the ti",e nnd 101elco:ne to look over our <br />shoulder. We don't think we are going to get away with anything with <br />the attitude of the Environmental Protection Agency as it is today. <br />The only people who have gotten away with anything were the big oil <br />companies and they had to get a bill through Congress, and I don't <br />think we can do that. <br /> <br />Mr. Ten Evck: The other question was, What daily fluctuation in <br />reservoir surface elevation do you contemplate by virtue of operating <br />this as a pumped storage project? <br /> <br />Mr. Brannan: Well, that Mr. Ten Eyck, is developed in great detail. <br />And do you know Jess Honald of the Bureau of Reclamation who has <br />just retired from the Bureau of Reclamation and has come to work for <br />us, or Marvin Greer? Both of these gentlemen have this worked out <br />and are prepared to corne in and talk to you. <br /> <br />Mr. Ten Evck: Well, it has some bearing on the appearance and the <br />utility of the site for recreatio~ purposes if it fluctuates six, <br />eight, ten, ~welve feet daily. This is a problem at Twin Lakes and <br />I assume would be a problem here as well. <br /> <br />Mr. Brannan: That's right and the Forest Service is concerned about <br />it, and I know we are going to have a problem when we talk to the <br />Environmental Portection Agency, too, as well as talking to you, <br />folks. But it is being done in a number of areas and I suppose we <br />must say in the broad sense of our responsibility that you can't <br />have the power and use the water for oil shale development and not <br />have some kind of defect in anoth~r area. <br /> <br />Mr. Stapleton: Mr. Brannan, before we continue with the questioning, <br />there has been a request that Mr. Sparks explain the map up here. <br /> <br />-15- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.