My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Board Meeting 03/17/1980
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
Board Meeting 03/17/1980
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:52:41 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:41:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
3/17/1980
Description
Agenda and Minutes
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />, v <br /> <br />continues under current funding. In that regard, Mr. McDonald <br /> <br />indicated that he has worked with Congressional Represeatatives <br /> <br />to providd language for project reauthcrization. <br /> <br />Mr. Kroeger then asked that the Water Conservation Board <br /> <br /> <br />join the Southwest Water Board in other interests in southwestern <br /> <br /> <br />Colorado in seeking 2.7 million dollars to start the RH Animas- <br /> <br /> <br />La Plata project. Mf. McDonald reported that the Senate and House <br /> <br /> <br />sub-committees will be considering projects in March 24 and 25 <br /> <br /> <br />hearings. He asked for instructions as th the Board's interest <br /> <br />in his participation. The consensus was that it would be appro- <br /> <br />priate for Mr. McDonald to represent the Board and support the <br /> <br />proposed 81 items described by service representatives. Mr. Kroeger <br /> <br />moved that the Director instructed to appear on behalf of Colorado <br /> <br />projects as proposed in the President's budget in an addition re- <br /> <br /> <br />quest that 2.79 million dollars by authorized for a new start on <br /> <br /> <br />the Animas-La Plata project. Mr. Fetcher secondeK the motion. <br /> <br /> <br />The vote was unanimous in favor. <br /> <br />Mxx Chairman Stapleton, then called for a report from the <br /> <br />Attorney General. Mr. McFarland began by inquiring if the Director <br /> <br /> <br />should be specifically instructed to request re-~uahorization of <br /> <br /> <br />the closed basin project. There being no objection, Chairman <br /> <br /> <br />Stapleton xR~ExxRK then ordered it included in the previous <br /> <br /> <br />motion. <br /> <br />Mr. McFatland hhen described the status of the Houston claims <br /> <br />before a special master awaiting oral argument described the state's <br /> <br />position as a middle one between that taken by Mr.Houston and his <br /> <br />supporters which would apply the appropriation doctrine to non- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.