My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Board Meeting 03/17/1980
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
Board Meeting 03/17/1980
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:52:41 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:41:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
3/17/1980
Description
Agenda and Minutes
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />5 <br /> <br />tural projects could be undertaken. Discussion also covered con- <br /> <br />sideration in emphasis by the Board o~ter,ebnservation dimensions <br /> <br />of any proposal, whether it be a new project or rehabilitation. <br /> <br />There was consensus that water conservation desrrves emphasis and <br /> <br />that greater attention will need to be paid to such elements if <br /> <br />the level om conseruction avtivity significantly increases. Fur- <br /> <br />ther discussion was deferred until a later agenda item. <br /> <br />Vice-ChairmanJ~Kroeger then asked for a presentation of agenda <br /> <br />item 3 minimum streamflows. <br />/ <br /> <br />Mr. Helton asked for consideration for final action on 93 <br /> <br />appropriations in Divisions 4 &.~. Those include 54 appropriations <br /> <br />in the Gunnison draingge..Principally on Tomeche Creek, Fast River, <br /> <br />Slate River, Ohio Creek and Lake Fork. There are 13 appropriations <br /> <br />recommended in the Eagle River, B on the upper Crystal. Also there <br /> <br />are 18 natural lake level appropriations recommended in the upper <br /> <br />Crystal drainage. He summarized the notification and review pro- <br /> <br />cess that the appropriations has received through staff activity. <br />~ <br />There were no adverse commends and~taff recommends for approval. <br /> <br />Mr. Jackson moved approval. Mr. McDonald seconded. In the dis- <br /> <br />cuss ion, Mr. Gormley inquired about the recommendations for <br /> <br />minimum streamflows which appear to exceed the recorded minimum. <br /> <br />Mr. Helton's response was that the recommended appropriat~on is <br /> <br />more than the absolute minimum but is not more than the average <br /> <br />and reflects generally the winter flows which are often the most <br /> <br />critical. Effect is that in the ~ritical winter period, the minimum <br /> <br />flow, it can be considered to be a full appropriation.i In the <br /> <br />discussion Mr. Raleigh Fischer, the Colorado River Water Conser- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.