My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00600
CWCB
>
Chatfield Mitigation
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00600
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:52:18 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:41:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
3/19/1956
Description
Minutes
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />3iffl"" <br />6Jl <br /> <br />MR. CRAWFORD: "One other was considered at one time <br />in this report, Battlement Mesa. The <br />construction of the Collbran Project <br />is in the same neighborhood. On this <br />account the Bureau didn't want to go <br />ahead. On Parshall, we can't get <br />money to go ahead on account of <br />the legal situation." . <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />MR. J. BARNARD: "You have two others in Grand County <br />and one in Pitkin County which I understand <br />have been subjected to reconnaissance <br />surveys, Troublesome, Rabbit Ears, <br />and Woody Creek." <br /> <br />~m. CRAWFORD: <br /> <br />MR. FINLINSON: <br /> <br />MR. PUGHE: <br /> <br />MR. MOSES: <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />~m. CRAWFORD: <br /> <br />"Woody Creek has financed itself. <br />Regareing Troublesome and Rabbit <br />Ears--no one has exerted any <br />effort to have them considered." <br /> <br />'~e have those in outiProgram. We <br />are looking to you for guidance." <br /> <br />"Is there anything more on these? <br />Are there any suggestions on the <br />priorities on the ~Bin Stem of <br />the Colorado? Do you have anything <br />to offer on any of that?" <br /> <br />"As I read the minutes of September 12, <br />this question of setting up what <br />is called a two year plan says: <br /> <br />'Check the Cliffs-Divide Projects <br />having a benefit-cost ratio less <br />than 1.0 for possible revision <br />which bring them above 1.0. a. <br />Fraser b.Bums c. Gypsum <br />d. Cattle Creek e. Divide Creek. <br />Also, Bluestone, modified, and <br />Battlement Mesa Projects'. <br /> <br />That was a plan for the'work of the <br />Board and staff." <br /> <br />"There is a report of a year ago <br />that does not show any particular <br />order adopted by the Board except <br />first places. West Divide was No. 1 <br />on the Main Stem of Colorado. The <br />others were not placed in their order." <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.