My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00586
CWCB
>
Chatfield Mitigation
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00586
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:52:11 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:41:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
4/8/1959
Description
Minutes
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
103
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />MR. STAPLETON: <br /> <br />MR. SPARKS: <br />MR. STAPLETON: <br /> <br /> MR. BARNARD, JR.: <br /> MR. STAPLETON: <br /> MR. MILENSKI: <br /> MR. STAPLETON: <br />I MR. MILLER: <br /> <br />1439 <br /> <br />far as the State of Colorado is concerned <br />we have no choice. That's one matter which <br />we will explore in Washington. <br /> <br />It was agreed that those objections <br />which people had would be explored in Wash- <br />ington. If everybody is convinced we can <br />do nothing about them, then that's the way <br />it must be. .If these principles can be <br />changed to make them more agreeable to cer- <br />tain people who object to them, that is what <br />we are shooting for. I think in general <br />that it has been agreed upon by both boards." <br /> <br />"Any members of the Board have any ques- <br />tions they would like to put to Mr. Sparks? <br />I take it that what we are talking about <br />Larry, is approval in principle in what we <br />have done so far with the view that at such <br />time as we reach an agreement, which I am <br />sure we will well within the next thirty <br />days, that this will come back to the Board <br />at a regular or special meeting for final <br />approval and that we can do nothing further <br />than that at this meeting." <br /> <br />"That's right." <br /> <br />-,. <br /> <br />"Gentlemen, I think in view of that <br />statement, so that the Director may know <br />your position on how far we have gone and <br />the approval or rejection of where we are <br />now, I'll entertain a motion to start the <br />Director to Washington next week." <br /> <br />"So moved, Mr. Chairman." <br /> <br />"It has been moved by Mr. Barnard. Is <br />there a second to that motion?" <br /> <br />"I second it." <br /> <br />"It has been seconded by Mr. Milenski. <br />Is there any further discussion?" <br /> <br />"On this question, Mr. Chairman. I take <br />it that we are involved with the wording of <br />the operating principles, revision April 6, <br />'59, no collateral documents at this time." <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.