Laserfiche WebLink
<br />a final recommendation, subject to the negotiations we have discussed <br />for the last half hour. <br /> <br />MR. VANDEMOER: I will make that motion. <br /> <br />MR. GORMLEY: Seconded. <br /> <br />MR.. .sTAPLETON: Any discussion? '(NO resp.onse.) <br /> <br />All those in favor signify by: saying '''Aye.'' (Ayes.) Those opposed? <br />(NO response.) <br /> <br />All right, let,'s go then to agenda item number 4., <br /> <br />.(Off ,the record discussion re lunch~on recess.) <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />First of all, before we adjourn for lunch, we have two of our former <br />Board members, craig' Goodwin. Craig, would you stand up? It is good to <br />see you. I will applaud you. (Applause, )" _ ',' <br /> <br />MR. GOODWIN: If you will allow me, I would just like to say, on the <br />fish and wildlife thing, I can make a lot of statements and probably <br />make a lot of enem~es, but at my age i~ doesn't matter mu~h. <br /> <br />I was on this, board many years.: 'you'may not know it,.a lot' of you, but <br />I think this hoard does more for fish and wildlife management themselves. <br />They always did, I'm sure of that. And they are money managers. They <br />are not game and fish managers. You'll find that out if you go a little <br />farther. <br /> <br />MR. STAPLETON:' All right,' Craig. <br /> <br />- . - - <br />The other one is Si Berthelson., Si, we~come a~oard. <br /> <br />(Applause.) <br /> <br />And' now we will adJourn for lunch. I <br />be back here at 1:15 and have another <br /> <br />don:' t' see any, <br />hour or SO of <br /> <br />. <br />reason why <br />meeting. <br /> <br />we can't <br /> <br />(Luncheon recess.) <br /> <br />.MR. STAPLETON: It is always good for the Chairman to have a legal <br />advisor. And during the noon recess, I received some legal advice, and <br />I would like you, to share it with,me, Mr. Attorney.General. <br /> <br />,MR. MacFARLANE: Mr. Chairman, Don Hamburg and I spoke a little bit after <br />the, meeting, and, frankly, we don't see, on a very quick look at the I <br />statutes that the Board has to apply:theAdmi~istrative Procedures Act-- ' <br />the hearing requirements in terms. of the matter we discussed just before <br />lunch. That is, it doesn't preclude the Board from hearing anybody it <br />wants to hear, but it is not an evidentiary hearing that we wo~ld be <br />bound by, subject to court review. So if that is the prOblem that you <br />are concerned about, I think I can lay your minds to rest on that. In <br />other words, any contest of the matter of any .decislorr of the Board <br />would be taken up at the time the. filings are,made rather than through <br />the administrative hearing proces~. <br /> <br />-32- <br />