My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00549
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00549
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:51:45 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:40:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
3/14/1979
Description
Agenda, Minutes, Resolution
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />we will be moving right- into actual construction of the wells and begin <br />to deliver water to the Rio: Grande sometime in the next couple of years. <br /> <br />If there are any questions, I will be happy to try to answer them. <br />MR. STAPLETON: Are the people- all happy down there now? <br /> <br />MR. MACH: In the Alamosa area? <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />MR. STAPLETON: Yes. <br /> <br />MR. MACH: As far as we can determine at this time, much of-the oppo- <br />sition that surfaced several years- ago has definitely died down. We <br />have a small- office in Alamosa- -itself now. It is a two-man office, and <br />we feel that this has- greatly helped, because: it is a place that people <br />can go to ask questions. We feel that part of the problem that we had <br />in the past was that much of the- opposItion was based somewhat on rumors <br />and mucb- false information. We were-coming in and doing some work for <br />maybe about 6 months and then being gone -for 6 months to a year, maybe, <br />and in between times, people wondered what was going on. And we feel- <br />fairly competent now that there is no--I'm not sure how to put it--any <br />strong opposition.: Obviously~ there is still some qpposition but not <br />nearly to the point: it was several years: ago.- <br /> <br />MR. STAPLETON: How deep are those wells-, the five that you are drilling? <br /> <br />MR.M:ACH-: All these we-lIs <br />fined- aquifer," of course. <br />vary from about 20 feet to <br />strictly on the particular <br /> <br />will not penetrate into the so-called: "con-- <br />Our testing today indicates that they will <br />a maximum of 80 feet deep. Again, it depends <br />area that you- are in. <br /> <br />MR. FETCHER: Is- the water good:quality? <br /> <br />MR. MACH: I have to answer that yes and no. We have changed some of <br />the locations: of the wells because we~have run into some pockets of what <br />we would call "bad water:." But we still feel confident that- we will be <br />able to meet the water quality standards set up in the Rio Grande com- <br />pact with the total project. We are finding both good and bad water, <br />but we are -finding more good water than bad water. <br /> <br />Now, one- of the prOblems we found is that, as you get towards this <br />mountain: range (indicating), the Foothill Range, that there are some <br />areas in there where there is some bad water near the surface. And some <br />of our long-term pumping this summer will be helpful: in tying that down <br />more closely. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />MR. STAPLETON: Mr. Kuiper; our.state Engineer, is not-here today; but- <br />what is the relationship with registering the wells with the state <br />Engineer and your: rights to the water? Can you tell us a little about <br />that background? <br /> <br />MR. MACH: Yes, the Rio Grande Water conservancy District is the legal <br />entity which is applying.to the State Engineer's office for water rights <br />for this particular project. And those water rights will remain vested - <br /> <br />-l4- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.