Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />rises about a foot above its normal bed elevation, we are going to have <br />to start pumping: some of the water to get it into the river. <br /> <br />One other aspect that I would like to point out that has been a change, <br />also, from the feasibility report is the salvage of surface water. The <br />original feasibility report on this particular project anticipated <br />salvaging about 15,000 acre-feet of water, basically, up in this area <br />(indicating 3 and 4) from the surface. This particular design and <br />approach was done, really, prior to our emphasis on the environment and <br />mainly our emphasis on wetlands, because of the pressure of those two <br />areas and also because the hydrology of this area has changed in the <br />sense that the irrigation that is occurring in the area now is more <br />efficient; they have changed from ditch irrigation and flood irrigation <br />to sprinklers. And the wet cycle itself, all of these factors have <br />combined to such a point that there really isn't that much surface water <br />available for salvaging up in this particular area here (indicating 3 <br />and 4). So our present plans anticipate that we will not salvage any <br />surface water. We are making no provisions to pick up surface water in <br />the area. We will only be utilizing groundwater, and all of- the water <br />will be coming from the wells_ themselves. <br /> <br />One other aspect that I would like to mention is that. one of the fea-- <br />tures that was pointed out in the feasibility report as part of this <br />particular project was enhancing the recreation and fish and wildlife <br />values of the San Luis Lake. The original plan calls for a connecting <br />channel between the main conveyance canal and the San Luis Lake, and <br />the water would simply be allowed to stablize at whatever elevation it <br />was in the canal itself. Now, one of the-problems we have run into is <br />that if-we use that approach the water quality in the San Luis Lake is <br />going to continue to deteriorate; and unless we do some recirculation or <br />pumping out of the water of the lake itself, it is simply going to get <br />to a point that it is saline enough that fishing is not going to be very <br />good and the recreation uses are going to be marginal. <br /> <br />So our present plans have two features involved. One of them we are <br />working with the state of Colorado. They are trying to develop a plan <br />to enhance the area around Head Lake to increase its value to ducks and <br />geese and then also from a fishing standpoint. And they hope to be able <br />to do some things up there with that particular area and establish that <br />into an excellent wildlife area. So what we are going to be doing is <br />allowing some water to be pumped into Head Lake and allowing it to over- <br />flow down an existing channel to San Luis Lake. Then, in addition to <br />that, we will be pumping about 3 or 4 wells directly into the lake <br />itself. And then to stabilize the water surface that is in San Luis <br />Lake, we will have a pumping plant located essentially over here in this <br />portion of the lake (indicating), and we will pump that water out of <br />the lake back into our conveyance canal. This will allow us to circu- <br />late water through the lake and maintain an elevation, a stabilized <br />water surface, and a stabilized water quality within the lake itself. <br />We think this is going to greatly enhance the recreation and fish and <br />wildlife values of the San Luis Lake area. <br /> <br />I think that pretty well wraps up where we are. We hope to get a good <br />construction start this fiscal year yet, before October 1. And if we do, <br /> <br />-13- <br />