My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00547
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00547
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:51:43 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:40:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
7/20/2004
Description
ISF Section - Upper Gunnison River Water Conservancy District, Case Nos. 4-02CW294 and 4-03CW107, Injury with Mitigation Proposal
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />BRATTON & McCLOW LLC <br /> <br />Mr. Ted Kowalski <br />July 7, 2004 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />category (4-7 points). USGS predicts that, in fiscal year 2005, medium ranking gages will lose <br />NSIP funding and receive reduced USGS federal matching funds to the extent that local cooperators <br />will be required to increase their contributions between 6.0% and 8.6%. The relatively small <br />increase for the first year of prioritization is designed to allow local cooperators time for transition <br />to changes in their share of the gage costs. USGS predicts that, over time, with increased costs of <br />streamgaging and changes in the streamgaging network, local cooperators will be expected to bear <br />a greater percentage of gage costs each year. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />At its meeting on June 28, the Board of Directors of the District reviewed the CWCB staff <br />analysis and received a report from a representative of USGS on the prioritization plan. A consensus <br />of the District Board was that, absent a commitment for local funding, gages of low and medium <br />ranking face a serious risk of being discontinued in view of the USGS budget constraints and <br />escalating operating costs. The Board concluded that the Slate River gage is of sufficient importance <br />to the basin that an affirmative response to the CWCB staff recommendation is appropriate. The <br />District agrees to include, as a condition to protect against injury in the decree in Case 03CWI07, <br />a commitment to operate and maintain the Slate River Near Crested Butte gage. <br /> <br />The District further has agreed to make revisions to the proposed ruling of the referee <br />suggested by you and Susan Schneider during our telephone conversation on Jun~ 22. <br /> <br />If! can provide further information, please contact me at your convenience. <br /> <br />Sincerely, <br /> <br /> <br />John H. McClow <br /> <br />c: Susan Schneider, Esq. (e-mail) <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.