My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00538
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00538
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:51:37 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:40:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
1/23/2002
Description
Flood Section - Floodplain Designations and Approvals
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />floodplains. The operations of Paonia Reservoir have been reflected in the approximate floodplains <br />shown on the North Fork of the Gunnison downstream of the Reservoir. <br />Community response: The CWCB staff transmitted a letter dated December 17, 2001 to the Gunnison <br />County floodplain administrator as notification of the proposed designation action for the subject Flood <br />Insurance Study. The County was also contacted by Montgomery Watson Harza (CWCB's engineering <br />consultant) via telephone to further discuss the proposed Board action. The County was receptive to the <br />designation process and verbally consented to the Board! action. The County indicated that it would <br />transmit a letter to the CWCB staff in the near future requesting designation of the subject floodplain <br />information. <br />Staff findings: A new hydrology addendum is being produced by Montgomery Watson Harass (CWCB' s <br />engineering consultant) to provide regulatory information and additional technical information to <br />supplement the September 1989 Flood Insurance Study for Gunnison County. New hydrology data (100- <br />year peak flow values) ,are being developed by Montgomery Watson for the approximate (Zone A) <br />, <br />floodplains shown on the FEMA map panels. (Detailed lQO-year flood hydrology values are required for <br />each stream in order to be in conformance with the dWCB's rules and regulations for floodplain <br />designation)~ CWCB staff has determined that the subject floodplain information for Gunnison County is <br />in conformance with the CWCB' s rules and regulations for floodplain designation and approval. <br />Staff recommendation: Staff recommends that the Board: 1) designate and approve the 100-year <br />detailed and approximate floodplain information containedin said report within unincorporated Gunnison <br />County, and 2) authorize staff to prepare a floodplain resolution to be signed by the Director and <br />transmitted to Gunnison County and FEMA. This action is recommended in order to meet statutory <br />requirements. <br /> <br />3) Ae:enda Item 2.c <br />Floodplain Resolution Number: FPR 01-558 <br />Affected Community: Douglas County <br />Name of study to be formally acted on: "Flood Hazard Area Delineation, Plum Creek Watershed, <br />Douglas County, Colorado" dated November 2001 - prepared by the Urban Drainage & Flood Control <br />District. ' <br />Studied Streams: The report includes detailed 100-year :floodplain information for Plum Creek and a <br />number of its tributaries within the County. The studied stream reaches are in the South Platte River <br />watershed. <br />Technical Issues: Topographic base mapping for this project was prepared by Landmark Mapping and <br />were compiled at a scale of 1"=200' with 2-foot contour intervals. The topographic maps were based on <br />aerial photographs taken in May 1999. Culvert and bridge structures were measured in the field. The <br />computer model CUHP was used to determine runoff chatacteristics from the studied watersheds as the <br />first step in the hydrologic analysis for this study. ~he computer model UDFCD SWMM was <br />subsequently used to route the CUHP generated runoff hydro graphs to finalize the hydrologic analysis. <br />Hydraulic analyses were carried out to determine the hydraulic conditions and associated capacities of the <br />studied channel reaches and structures. For this study, ,the u.s. Army Corps of Engineers computer <br />program HECRAS was used to determine water surface profiles for various flood frequencies and to <br />. compute channel and structure capacities. Water surface profiles were computed for the 10-, 50-, 100-, <br />and 500-year storm events. Floodways were also generateq. In summary, all of the technical information <br />is consistent with accepted engineering practices and With the CWCB's rules and regulations for <br />floodplain designation. ' <br /> <br />Flood Protection. Water Project Planning and Financing. Stream and Lak~ Protection <br />Water Supply Protection. Conservation Planning <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.