My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00537
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00537
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:51:36 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:40:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
3/21/2002
Description
CF Section - Severance Tax Trust Fund Operational Account Recommendations
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />7. <br /> <br />Assessment of Remediation of Fluvial Tailings Deposits <br /> <br />Grantee/Contractor: <br /> <br />Lake County Soil Conservation District <br /> <br />Amount of Request: <br /> <br />$33,100 <br /> <br />Ranking: <br /> <br />Low <br /> <br />Product Produced: The project conducts a water quality assessment of the unsaturated zone and <br />underlying groundwater in an area where remediation of fluvial tailings deposits have been <br />accomplished through surficial application and shallow incorporation of biosolids and limestone or lime. <br />The study site is in the upper Arkansas River stream reach downstream from Leadville. <br /> <br />Water Planning Relationship: Assessment of the effectiveness of an innovative, insitu <br />remediation (demonstration project) that has been applied to fluvial tailings deposits in the floodplain of <br />the upper Arkansas River. This water quality project has methods/techniques with presumed <br />applicability to other areas of the state. <br /> <br />Recommendati9n: Staff gives a low recommendation for funding of this project due to the water <br />quality nature of the project versus the water nlission of the CWCB that does not necessarily include <br />water quality. Staff feels that this worthwhile project would be better funded from a more appropriate <br />source. <br /> <br />A spreadsheet listing the projects and the recommended rankings is attached. <br /> <br />FINAL RECOMMENDATION: <br /> <br />No action is needed on part A or B unless you want us to change the use of the money. <br /> <br />With respect to Part C, we recommend that you approve the staff ranking for each project and <br />direct us to allocate funding based on the amount of Severance Tax available within the CWCB's <br />five-percent share. We will not know how much will be available until the Legislature acts on <br />proposals to divert a portion of Severance Tax to the General Fund and/or place a cap on <br />contribution into the Operational Account. <br /> <br />13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.