My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00508
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00508
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:51:25 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:39:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
2/17/1958
Description
Minutes
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />857 <br /> <br />, <br />, <br /> <br />Mr. Nelson brought up the subject of a package <br />proposal to go to Congress from several Western States ask- <br />ing for appropr~ations on reclamation projects. He said <br />that Senator Watkins had recently 'broke down' and asked <br />that Paonia and Vernal be included in appropriations this <br />year. <br /> <br />MR. PETERSON: "I am a little bit concerned about <br />Paonia being connected with any other <br />project. I believe, since it has an old <br />start, it should be given consideration <br />alone." <br /> <br />MR. CRAWFORD: "I should like to state that both <br />the Governor and I appeared before the <br />Budget Committee last year and emphasized <br />the fact that this was not a new project, <br />that it had been started quite a few <br />years ago." <br /> <br />MR. BARNARD, JR: "I move that Mr. Sparks be authorized <br />and directed to prepare a resolution ex- <br />pressing the very strong sentiment of <br />this Board that the elimination of the <br />Paonia project from the national budget <br />for the current year on the basis that <br />it is a 'new start' is based on incor- <br />rect facts and that funds for this proj- <br />ect should definitely be made available <br />in the coming fiscal year." <br /> <br />MR. LEW WILLIAMS: "I second the motion." <br /> <br />MR. MOSES: "Are you ready for the question?" <br />MR. NELSON: "Question." <br /> <br />The motion was unanimously carried. <br /> <br />Mr. Peterson said that he had heard the feasibility <br />of the Curecanti is being questioned due to lack of power re- <br />quirements within the area it would serve. He believes the <br />power connections would alleviate the shortage of power in <br />Eastern Colorado if the project was constructed at this time <br />and that the Board should watch to see that Curecanti does <br />not fall by the wayside because of this question, if it is <br />true. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.