Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />875 <br /> <br />MR. CRAWFORD: <br /> <br />'~he Committee met and has divided the <br />comments into two parts. The first report has <br />to do with the San Juan-Chama and eliminates <br />the Navajo and Indian parts." <br /> <br />Dean Crawford read the following: <br /> <br />, <br />"Colorado favors the full development of the water allo- <br />cated the Upper Basin States under compact. The construction of <br />the San Juan-Chama and the Navajo Projects along with other poten- <br />tial projects, and the development of the prospective uses of <br />. water in the San Juan Basin would be of great benefit to the area <br />served. <br /> <br />The San Juan River Basin comprises a very important <br />natural resource section of both New Mexico and Colorado. As the <br />runoff of the San Juan River originates largely on Colorado Water <br />Shed, Colorado feels a joint responsibility with the State of New <br />Mexico in rendering state support arid guidance for development of <br />this all important resource of that section of the two states. <br /> <br />Recognizing this joint responsibility with the State of <br />New Mexico and to the citizens of the San Juan Basin, Colorado feels <br />it has had insufficient time for a complete analysis of the two <br />reports and the long time effect of the proposed development on <br />the San Juan Basin. From first examination of the reports, and <br />in keeping with sound national resource development, it would <br />appear desirable tl'at the two states have the benefit of an an- <br />alysis of a'complete basin plan of water development in order <br />to assess long time requirements. <br /> <br />It appears that some differences of opinion exist in <br />respect to these projects. Realizing that fact, the Governors <br />of the States of New Mexico and Colorado are following establish- <br />ed procedures. to determine the facts involved and to attempt to <br />resolve any differences that are found to exist." <br /> <br />MR. CRAWFORD: <br /> <br />'~he first part of the letter has to do <br />with technical matters which has been written <br />by Mr. Gildersleeve and myself." <br /> <br />MR. BURR: <br /> <br />"Does that have the unanimous approval <br />of the Committee?" <br /> <br />MR. CRAWFORD: <br /> <br />"Yes, it does, of the full Committee. <br />On that Committee there were Mr. Sparks, Mr. <br />Lew Williams, Mr. Barnard, Ex-Gov. Ammons <br />for Mr. Stapleton, and myself. Mr. Eakes <br />and Mr. Jex sat in with us." <br />