Laserfiche WebLink
<br />is that we have had the maximum amount of input in this matter. I <br />would like to ask, unless Larry and the staff have any strong feelings <br />to the contrary, that we postpone consideration of these matters until <br />May land 2 when we meet in Grand Junction. We postponed this once. <br />I am not inclined to postpone it again, but I think some of the matters <br />that have been brought up are worthy of further conference. We have <br />been talking of fish flows and hearing about them for years and I can't <br />understand how everybody up in Fort Collins and Greeley got left by the <br />wayside. I only make that as an observation, not as a criticism. We <br />have mailing lists and if you are not on them, we will be delighted to <br />put you on them. I wish you would get everybody on the mailing list. <br />Mrs. Martel over there will take anybody' s name and let's get to the <br />point where we will take some action on it in May. Is that satisfactory? <br /> <br />Mr. Moses: There are five on the agenda. <br /> <br />Mr. Stapleton: Is the Colorado River Board willing to go on the other <br />five"! <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />Mr. Rolly Fischer: The <br />if I may, Mr. Chairman. <br />Ark legislation? <br /> <br />answer is no. Let me ask a question of counsel <br />Are these the same, Ray, that are in the Fry- <br /> <br />Mr. Moses: That is my understanding. <br /> <br />Mr. Rolly Fischer: If ther are the same that are in the Fry-Ark legis- <br />lation, the River District s policy is to support those minimum stream <br />flows. We have already agreed to it in the operating principles. <br /> <br />Mr. Moses: It is Midway Creek, No Name Creek and three other creeks. <br /> <br />Mr. Helton: What about Beaver Creek? <br /> <br />Board Member: And you have two on the Crystal. <br /> <br />Mr. Fischer: No, we don't agree on those. <br /> <br />Mr. Stapleton: How about Beaver Creek? Yes, sir, Tam. Tam, could <br />you come up here. Your words we never want to miss, ever. <br /> <br />Mr. Scott: Thank you for your kind conunents, Mr. Chairman. I just <br />want to ask Ray Moses or Mr. Sparks about the comparison between the <br />proposed claims on Hunter Creek, which are the same as the Fry-Ark <br />operating principles. How they compare to the claims that Pitkin county <br />filed. <br /> <br />Mr. Sparks: <br />Mr. Scott: <br />Mr. Sparks: <br />Mr. Mose s : <br /> <br />The numbers are higher than what Pitkin county claimed. <br />Higher. <br />We think Pitkin county made a mistake in its computations. <br />The Fry-Ark legislation established the flows. <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />-2?- <br />